Powell Sean T, Allison Matthew A, Kalichman Michael W
Research Ethics Program, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0612, USA.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Jun;13(2):249-64. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9012-y. Epub 2007 Jun 19.
Training in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) is required for many research trainees nationwide, but little is known about its effectiveness. For a preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of a short-term course in RCR, medical students participating in an NIH-funded summer research program at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) were surveyed using an instrument developed through focus group discussions. In the summer of 2003, surveys were administered before and after a short-term RCR course, as well as to alumni of the courses given in the summers of 2002 and 2001. Survey responses were analyzed in the areas of knowledge, ethical decision-making skills, attitudes about responsible conduct of research, and frequency of discussions about RCR outside of class. The only statistically significant improvement associated with the course was an increase in knowledge, while there was a non-significant tendency toward improvements in ethical decision-making skills and attitudes about the importance of RCR training. The nominal impact of a short-term training course should not be surprising, but it does raise the possibility that other options for delivering information only, such as an Internet-based tutorial, might be considered as comparable alternatives when longer courses are not possible.
全国许多科研学员都需要接受科研行为责任(RCR)培训,但对其效果却知之甚少。为了初步评估一门RCR短期课程的效果,我们使用通过焦点小组讨论开发的工具,对参与美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助的加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校(UCSD)暑期科研项目的医学生进行了调查。2003年夏天,在一门RCR短期课程前后进行了调查,同时也对2002年和2001年夏天开设的课程的校友进行了调查。对调查问卷的回复在知识、道德决策技能、对科研行为责任的态度以及课外关于RCR的讨论频率等方面进行了分析。与该课程相关的唯一具有统计学意义的改善是知识的增加,而在道德决策技能和对RCR培训重要性的态度方面有不显著的改善趋势。短期培训课程的名义影响并不令人惊讶,但它确实提出了一种可能性,即当无法开设更长时间的课程时,其他仅提供信息的选项,如基于互联网的教程,可能被视为可比的替代方案。