Plemmons Dena K, Kalichman Michael W
University of California, San Diego, CA 92093-0612, USA.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Apr;8(2):95-103. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.2.95.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) training grant requirement to provide training in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) is now more than 20 years old. Implicit in the requirement is that this training will have an impact not only on what trainees know, but on what they know how to do. There is, however, a range of responses about what skills are seen to be necessary for the ethical practice of science. As part of a larger, earlier study examining RCR instructors' overall goals in teaching RCR, we asked 50 RCR instructors from 37 different institutions what their goals were for teaching skills in their RCR courses. The responses about what constituted necessary skills were wide ranging, from a focus on teaching the skill of ethical decision making to the perceived importance of ensuring that trainees understand the importance of the community in some research relationships. This diversity in responses about what skills should be taught in RCR courses is not especially surprising, given the variation in instructors, formats, instruction, goals, and outcome measures for RCR courses, but it does reinforce the necessity of giving more thought to what goals are to be achieved. This is true not only of skills to be learned, but of any other objectives one might have for research ethics teaching and learning.
美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)要求提供负责任的研究行为(RCR)培训已有20多年历史了。该要求隐含的意思是,这种培训不仅会影响学员的知识储备,还会影响他们的实际操作能力。然而,对于科学伦理实践所需技能的看法存在一系列不同观点。作为一项规模更大、更早开展的研究的一部分,该研究考察了RCR教员在教授RCR方面的总体目标,我们询问了来自37个不同机构的50名RCR教员,他们在RCR课程中教授技能的目标是什么。关于哪些技能构成必要技能的回答范围很广,从专注于教授伦理决策技能到认为确保学员理解社区在某些研究关系中的重要性的重要性。考虑到RCR课程在教员、形式、教学、目标和成果衡量方面的差异,RCR课程中应教授哪些技能的回答存在这种多样性并不特别令人惊讶,但这确实强化了更深入思考要实现哪些目标的必要性。这不仅适用于要学习的技能,也适用于人们在研究伦理教学方面可能有的任何其他目标。