Terakawa Yui, Handa Mariko, Ichinohe Tatsuya, Kaneko Yuzuru
Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Tokyo Dental College, Mihama-ku, Chiba, Japan.
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2007 Feb;48(1):37-42. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.48.37.
The goal of this study was to compare oral mucosal blood flow and duration of anesthetic action after stellate ganglion block (SGB) using lidocaine, with or without epinephrine, and discuss the effect of epinephrine on SGB. Duration of anesthetic action was defined as elapsed time from finish of injection to recovery of common carotid blood flow (CCBF) to within+/-5% of respective control value. Male Japan White rabbits were anesthetized with isoflurane and mechanically ventilated. Common carotid blood flow and tongue mucosal tissue blood flow (TMBF) were measured with an ultrasound flowmeter and laser Doppler flowmeter, respectively. End-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (ETCO(2)) and hemodynamic variables were continuously monitored, including heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP). For SGB, the tip of the needle was placed on the left transverse process of the cervical vertebra, 1-2 mm caudal to the cricoid cartilage. Either 0.1 ml of 1% lidocaine (Group L) or 1% lidocaine containing 10 mug/ml epinephrine (Group LE) was injected for SGB. There were no differences in values at immediately before SGB and at the time when maximal change in CCBF was observed after SGB for ETCO(2), HR, SBP, DBP or MAP in either group. CCBF showed a significant increase in Group L after SGB. In contrast, CCBF only showed a slight increase in Group LE. TMBF showed a significant increase in Group L after SGB, but not in Group LE. No differences in time required for maximal effect were observed between the two groups. In contrast, duration of anesthetic action in Group LE was significantly longer than that in Group L. Addition of epinephrine to local anesthetic solutions is not suitable for SGB, as it may not facilitate an increase in tissue blood flow, which is the primary objective of SGB.
本研究的目的是比较使用含或不含肾上腺素的利多卡因进行星状神经节阻滞(SGB)后口腔黏膜血流及麻醉作用持续时间,并探讨肾上腺素对SGB的影响。麻醉作用持续时间定义为从注射结束至颈总动脉血流(CCBF)恢复到各自对照值的±5%以内所经过的时间。雄性日本白兔用异氟烷麻醉并进行机械通气。分别用超声流量计和激光多普勒流量计测量颈总动脉血流和舌黏膜组织血流(TMBF)。持续监测呼气末二氧化碳分压(ETCO₂)和血流动力学变量,包括心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)和平均动脉压(MAP)。对于SGB,将针尖置于环状软骨尾侧1 - 2毫米处的颈椎左侧横突上。SGB时注射0.1毫升1%利多卡因(L组)或含10微克/毫升肾上腺素的1%利多卡因(LE组)。两组在SGB前即刻以及SGB后观察到CCBF最大变化时的ETCO₂、HR、SBP、DBP或MAP值均无差异。SGB后L组的CCBF显著增加。相比之下,LE组的CCBF仅略有增加。SGB后L组的TMBF显著增加,但LE组未增加。两组间达到最大效应所需时间无差异。相比之下,LE组的麻醉作用持续时间显著长于L组。在局部麻醉溶液中添加肾上腺素不适用于SGB,因为它可能无助于增加组织血流,而这是SGB的主要目标。