Suppr超能文献

SMART研究中中断抗逆转录病毒治疗期间的癌症风险。

Risk of cancers during interrupted antiretroviral therapy in the SMART study.

作者信息

Silverberg Michael J, Neuhaus Jacqueline, Bower Mark, Gey Daniela, Hatzakis Angelos, Henry Keith, Hidalgo Jose, Lourtau Leonardo, Neaton James D, Tambussi Giuseppe, Abrams Donald I

机构信息

Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California 94110, USA.

出版信息

AIDS. 2007 Sep 12;21(14):1957-63. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282ed6338.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare rates of AIDS-defining and non-AIDS-defining malignancies between patients on a CD4 T-cell-guided antiretroviral therapy (ART) strategy and continuous ART.

DESIGN

A randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

Malignancy rates were compared between the drug conservation arm in which ART was stopped if the CD4 T-cell count exceeded 350 cells/microl and (re)started if it fell to less than 250 cells/microl and the viral suppression arm utilizing continuous ART. Cox models were used to examine baseline characteristics including age, sex, race, cigarette use, previous malignancies, CD4 T-cell and HIV-RNA levels, hepatitis B or C, and ART duration.

RESULTS

A total of 5472 participants were randomly assigned to treatment groups, of whom 70 developed cancer: 13 AIDS-defining malignancies and 58 non-AIDS-defining malignancies (one patient had both). The AIDS-defining malignancy rate per 1000 person-years was higher in the drug conservation arm (3.0 versus 0.5). Proximal CD4 T-cell and HIV RNA levels mediated much of this increased risk. The drug conservation arm also had higher rates of Kaposi's sarcoma (1.9 versus 0.3) and lymphoma (Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's; 1.1 versus 0.3). The non-AIDS-defining malignancy rate was similar between the drug conservation and viral suppression arms (8.8 versus 7.1). The most common non-AIDS-defining malignancies were skin (n = 16), lung (n = 8) and prostate (n = 6) cancers.

CONCLUSION

Non-AIDS-defining malignancies were more common in this cohort than AIDS-defining malignancies. This analysis provides further evidence against the use of CD4 T-cell-guided ART because of a higher risk of AIDS-defining malignancies in addition to opportunistic infections and deaths.

摘要

目的

比较采用CD4 T细胞引导的抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)策略的患者与持续接受ART治疗的患者中,艾滋病定义性恶性肿瘤和非艾滋病定义性恶性肿瘤的发生率。

设计

一项随机临床试验。

方法

比较药物保存组(若CD4 T细胞计数超过350个细胞/微升则停止ART,若降至低于250个细胞/微升则重新开始)和采用持续ART的病毒抑制组之间的恶性肿瘤发生率。使用Cox模型检查基线特征,包括年龄、性别、种族、吸烟情况、既往恶性肿瘤史、CD4 T细胞和HIV-RNA水平、乙肝或丙肝以及ART持续时间。

结果

共有5472名参与者被随机分配到治疗组,其中70人患癌:13例艾滋病定义性恶性肿瘤和58例非艾滋病定义性恶性肿瘤(1例患者同时患有两种)。每1000人年的艾滋病定义性恶性肿瘤发生率在药物保存组更高(3.0比0.5)。近端CD4 T细胞和HIV RNA水平介导了大部分这种增加的风险。药物保存组的卡波西肉瘤发生率也更高(1.9比0.3)和淋巴瘤(霍奇金淋巴瘤和非霍奇金淋巴瘤;1.1比0.3)。药物保存组和病毒抑制组之间的非艾滋病定义性恶性肿瘤发生率相似(8.8比7.1)。最常见的非艾滋病定义性恶性肿瘤是皮肤癌(n = 16)、肺癌(n = 8)和前列腺癌(n = 6)。

结论

在该队列中,非艾滋病定义性恶性肿瘤比艾滋病定义性恶性肿瘤更常见。该分析提供了进一步证据反对使用CD4 T细胞引导的ART,因为除了机会性感染和死亡外,艾滋病定义性恶性肿瘤的风险更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验