Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2449-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1639-8. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
Bile duct injury (BDI) is a dreaded complication of cholecystectomy, often caused by misinterpretation of biliary anatomy. To prevent BDI, techniques have been developed for intraoperative assessment of bile duct anatomy. This article reviews the evidence for the different techniques and discusses their strengths and weaknesses in terms of efficacy, ease, and cost-effectiveness.
PubMed was searched from January 1980 through December 2009 for articles concerning bile duct visualization techniques for prevention of BDI during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Nine techniques were identified. The critical-view-of-safety approach, indirectly establishing biliary anatomy, is accepted by most guidelines and commentaries as the surgical technique of choice to minimize BDI risk. Intraoperative cholangiography is associated with lower BDI risk (OR 0.67, CI 0.61-0.75). However, it incurs extra costs, prolongs the operative procedure, and may be experienced as cumbersome. An established reliable alternative is laparoscopic ultrasound, but its longer learning curve limits widespread implementation. Easier to perform are cholecystocholangiography and dye cholangiography, but these yield poor-quality images. Light cholangiography, requiring retrograde insertion of an optical fiber into the common bile duct, is too unwieldy for routine use. Experimental techniques are passive infrared cholangiography, hyperspectral cholangiography, and near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography. The latter two are performed noninvasively and provide real-time images. Quantitative data in patients are necessary to further evaluate these techniques.
The critical-view-of-safety approach should be used during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intraoperative cholangiography or laparoscopic ultrasound is recommended to be performed routinely. Hyperspectral cholangiography and near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography are promising novel techniques to prevent BDI and thus increase patient safety.
胆管损伤(BDI)是胆囊切除术的一种严重并发症,通常是由于对胆管解剖结构的误解所致。为了预防 BDI,可以采用一些技术来在术中评估胆管解剖结构。本文回顾了这些不同技术的证据,并就其有效性、易用性和成本效益比进行了讨论。
检索 1980 年 1 月至 2009 年 12 月期间有关预防腹腔镜胆囊切除术中 BDI 的胆管可视化技术的文献。
共确定了 9 种技术。“安全视野”技术,即间接确定胆管解剖结构,已被大多数指南和评论认可为降低 BDI 风险的首选手术技术。术中胆管造影术可降低 BDI 风险(OR 0.67,95%CI 0.61-0.75)。但它会增加额外的成本,延长手术时间,而且可能会被认为繁琐。已建立的可靠替代方法是腹腔镜超声,但它的学习曲线较长,限制了其广泛应用。更容易操作的是胆囊胆管造影术和染料胆管造影术,但它们的图像质量较差。胆管光镜检查需要将光纤逆行插入胆总管,操作不便,无法常规使用。实验性技术是被动式红外线胆管造影术、高光谱胆管造影术和近红外线荧光胆管造影术。后两种技术是无创的,可提供实时图像。有必要在患者中获得定量数据,以进一步评估这些技术。
腹腔镜胆囊切除术中应采用“安全视野”技术。建议常规进行术中胆管造影术或腹腔镜超声检查。高光谱胆管造影术和近红外线荧光胆管造影术是预防 BDI 、提高患者安全性的有前途的新技术。