Suppr超能文献

男性中由脉冲噪声(武器噪声)引起的延迟性暂时性阈移。

Delayed temporary threshold shift induced by impulse noises (weapon noises) in men.

作者信息

Dancer A, Grateau P, Cabanis A, Vaillant T, Lafont D

机构信息

French-German Research Institute of Saint-Louis, France.

出版信息

Audiology. 1991;30(6):345-56. doi: 10.3109/00206099109072896.

Abstract

Most of the available information on the effects of impulse noise on hearing is derived from temporary threshold shift (TTS2) measurements performed 2 min after a single exposure to small-weapon noises. TTS is known to recover as a linear function of the logarithm of time when it is induced by a continuous noise of moderate intensity. Following the exposure to impulse noise, several investigators have reported individual exceptions to the log-time relation, e.g. increases in TTS during the first hour of recovery. These authors observed a 'rebound recovery function' for most of the exposed men, and they conclude that this phenomenon '... has implications for the use of TTS in the construction of damage risk criteria for hazardous noise exposure ..., a single measure, such as the widely used TTS2 may not be an adequate index of the magnitude of the TTS'. In order to thoroughly investigate in man the existence of 'delayed' TTS following the exposure to actual weapon noises, the 'French Committee on Weapon Noises' carried out the following study. Three groups of soldiers (28 subjects) wearing no hearing protection were exposed in the free field over 2 days to impulse noises produced by a rifle. Békésy audiograms were obtained from each subject just before the exposure, and at 5 min, 1 h and 4 h after exposure. All audiometric tests were carried out even when no TTS was observable in the first postexposure audiogram. A significant number of subjects showed a 'delayed TTS' and/or 'rebound recovery'. The maximum TTS was observed at 1 h after exposure, but the observation of a delayed recovery and a rebound recovery indicate that audiometric tests should be performed in all cases at least up to 4 h after the exposure. More detailed work is necessary to establish what changes may be necessary in the present damage risk criteria for impulse noises of a very high level.

摘要

关于脉冲噪声对听力影响的现有信息大多来自单次暴露于小武器噪声后2分钟进行的暂时性阈移(TTS2)测量。已知当中等强度的连续噪声诱发暂时性阈移时,它会作为时间对数的线性函数恢复。在暴露于脉冲噪声后,几位研究者报告了对数时间关系的个别例外情况,例如在恢复的第一个小时内暂时性阈移增加。这些作者观察到大多数暴露者呈现出“反弹恢复函数”,他们得出结论,这种现象“……对于在构建危险噪声暴露的损伤风险标准中使用暂时性阈移有影响……,单一测量指标,如广泛使用的TTS2,可能不足以作为暂时性阈移大小的指标”。为了全面研究人类在暴露于实际武器噪声后是否存在“延迟”的暂时性阈移,“法国武器噪声委员会”进行了以下研究。三组士兵(28名受试者)未佩戴听力保护装置,在自由场中连续两天暴露于步枪产生的脉冲噪声中。在暴露前、暴露后5分钟、1小时和4小时从每个受试者获取贝凯西听力图。即使在暴露后的首次听力图中未观察到暂时性阈移,所有听力测试也都进行。相当数量的受试者表现出“延迟的暂时性阈移”和/或“反弹恢复”。最大的暂时性阈移在暴露后1小时观察到,但延迟恢复和反弹恢复的观察表明,在所有情况下,听力测试至少应在暴露后4小时进行。需要进行更详细的工作来确定对于非常高强度的脉冲噪声,当前的损伤风险标准可能需要哪些改变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验