Shvartsburg Alexandre A, Smith Richard D
Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, USA.
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2007 Sep;18(9):1672-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2007.06.013. Epub 2007 Jun 30.
Continuing development of the technology and applications of field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS) calls for better understanding of its limitations and factors that govern them. While key performance metrics such as resolution and ion transmission have been calculated for specific cases employing numerical simulations, the underlying physical trends remained obscure. Here we determine that the resolving power of planar FAIMS scales as the square root of separation time and sensitivity drops exponentially at the rate controlled by absolute ion mobility and several instrument parameters. A strong dependence of ion transmission on mobility severely discriminates against species with higher mobility, presenting particular problems for analyses of complex mixtures. While the time evolution of resolution and sensitivity is virtually identical in existing FAIMS systems using gas flow and proposed devices driven by electric field, the distributions of separation times are not. The inverse correlation between mobility (and thus diffusion speed) and residence time for ions in field-driven FAIMS greatly reduces the mobility-based discrimination and provides much more uniform separations. Under typical operating conditions, the spread of elimination rates for commonly analyzed ions is reduced from >5 times in flow-driven to 1.6 times in field-driven FAIMS while the difference in resolving power decreases from approximately 60% to approximately 15%.
场不对称波形离子迁移谱(FAIMS)技术与应用的持续发展,需要更好地理解其局限性以及控制这些局限性的因素。虽然已针对特定情况通过数值模拟计算了诸如分辨率和离子传输等关键性能指标,但潜在的物理趋势仍不明确。在此,我们确定平面FAIMS的分辨能力与分离时间的平方根成正比,且灵敏度以由绝对离子迁移率和几个仪器参数控制的速率呈指数下降。离子传输对迁移率的强烈依赖性严重歧视了具有较高迁移率的物种,这给复杂混合物的分析带来了特殊问题。虽然在使用气流的现有FAIMS系统和由电场驱动的拟建设备中,分辨率和灵敏度的时间演变几乎相同,但分离时间的分布却不同。在电场驱动的FAIMS中,离子迁移率(进而扩散速度)与停留时间之间的负相关大大降低了基于迁移率的歧视,并提供了更为均匀的分离效果。在典型操作条件下,常见分析离子的消除率范围从气流驱动FAIMS中的>5倍降至电场驱动FAIMS中的1.6倍,而分辨能力的差异则从约60%降至约15%。