Page Melissa, Parker Sheila H, Renger Ralph
University of Arizona, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Health Promot Pract. 2009 Jan;10(1):76-82. doi: 10.1177/1524839906296012. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
When a program does not produce expected changes in the outcomes of interest, program staff must understand why before making programmatic decisions. One mechanism for doing so is the logic model. This article describes how using one such logic model (the ATM approach) was used to improve areas of program planning and implementation. The key components include interviewing stakeholders to identify antecedent conditions to the problem of interest that are placed in a summary map and then prioritizing those conditions to address with program activities. Although the logic modeling process was helpful in making programmatic improvements, there were also several unintended benefits of engaging in the process including: providing a framework for planning and evaluation, helping the program operate more effectively and efficiently, and providing a common language among program staff and the evaluators.
当一个项目未能在预期的感兴趣结果上产生变化时,项目工作人员在做出项目决策之前必须了解原因。一种做到这一点的机制是逻辑模型。本文描述了如何使用这样一种逻辑模型(ATM方法)来改进项目规划和实施的各个方面。关键组成部分包括与利益相关者进行访谈,以确定感兴趣问题的先行条件,并将这些条件置于一个总结图中,然后对这些条件进行优先级排序,以便通过项目活动来解决。尽管逻辑建模过程有助于进行项目改进,但参与该过程还有一些意想不到的好处,包括:为规划和评估提供一个框架,帮助项目更有效率和效益地运作,以及在项目工作人员和评估人员之间提供一种共同语言。