Jehle Dietrich, Kuebler Joseph, Auinger Peggy
Department of Emergency Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;14(10):899-902. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.029. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
Rollover crashes are responsible for a large portion of motor vehicle occupant injuries and fatalities.
To examine if there is an increased risk of injury or death for either front seat occupant depending on the direction the vehicle rolled over.
Between 1992 and 2002, crash data were collected and analyzed from the National Accident Sampling System Crashworthiness Data System (NASS/CDS) database of police reported tow-away crashes in the United States. These data were limited to information concerning single vehicle crashes with right or left initial rollover, in which both driver and front seat passenger were present and secured with lap-shoulder belts. The "outside arc" occupant was defined as the occupant who underwent the greatest degree of initial rotational torque during the rollover. Crashes involving sport utility vehicles (SUVs) were further evaluated for risks of injury or death based on the direction of the initial rollover. The location of roof crush and the types of injuries were also analyzed for these rollovers. This weighted database allows for the calculation of mortality and injury prevalence in the population.
There was a significantly higher fatality rate for outside arc occupants than inside arc occupants in rollover crashes. The weighted percentage fatality for the occupant on the outside arc for all classes of light passenger vehicles was 0.38%, while the percentage fatality for the occupant on the inside arc was 0.23% (odds ratio [OR], 1.64; p = 0.04). As a subgroup, the SUV class showed a weighted outside arc fatality percentage of 0.23%, while the inside arc fatality percentage was 0.02% (OR, 10.69; p = 0.06). Additionally, in SUVs, the weighted percentage having an Injury Severity Score of 9-75 was 0.99% for the outside arc passengers but only 0.19% for the inside arc passengers (OR, 5.42; p = 0.04). Roof crush was located more commonly on the outside arc of the rollovers than on the inside arc (42% vs. 26.3%; p < 0.01). There was a trend toward increased head and neck injuries in the fatal rollover crashes when compared with fatalities in the entire NASS/CDS database (91% vs. 58%; p = 0.06).
The risk of death for outside arc occupants was higher than for inside arc occupants in rollovers. In addition, outside arc occupants in SUV rollover crashes were more likely to incur moderate or severe traumatic injuries. Roof crush occurs more commonly on the outside arc, and head and neck injuries were more prevalent in rollover crashes.
翻车事故导致了很大一部分机动车驾乘人员的伤亡。
根据车辆翻车的方向,研究前排座位上的任何一名驾乘人员受伤或死亡的风险是否增加。
1992年至2002年期间,从美国国家事故抽样系统碰撞安全性数据系统(NASS/CDS)数据库中收集并分析了警方报告的拖走事故的碰撞数据。这些数据仅限于有关单车碰撞且最初向右或向左翻车的信息,其中驾驶员和前排座位乘客均在场并系有安全带。“外侧弧”驾乘人员被定义为在翻车过程中承受最大初始旋转扭矩的驾乘人员。对于涉及运动型多用途汽车(SUV)的碰撞事故,根据初始翻车方向进一步评估受伤或死亡风险。还分析了这些翻车事故中车顶挤压的位置和损伤类型。这个加权数据库允许计算人群中的死亡率和受伤患病率。
在翻车事故中,外侧弧驾乘人员的死亡率明显高于内侧弧驾乘人员。所有轻型乘用车外侧弧驾乘人员的加权死亡率为0.38%,而内侧弧驾乘人员的死亡率为0.23%(优势比[OR],1.64;p = 0.04)。作为一个亚组,SUV类车型外侧弧的加权死亡率为0.23%,而内侧弧的死亡率为0.02%(OR,10.69;p = 0.06)。此外,在SUV中,外侧弧乘客损伤严重程度评分为9 - 75分的加权百分比为0.99%,而内侧弧乘客仅为0.19%(OR,5.42;p = 0.04)。翻车事故中车顶挤压更常见于外侧弧而非内侧弧(42%对26.3%;p < 0.01)。与整个NASS/CDS数据库中的死亡事故相比,致命翻车事故中头部和颈部受伤有增加的趋势(91%对58%;p = 0.06)。
在翻车事故中,外侧弧驾乘人员的死亡风险高于内侧弧驾乘人员。此外SUV翻车事故中的外侧弧驾乘人员更有可能遭受中度或重度创伤性损伤。车顶挤压更常见于外侧弧,并且翻车事故中头部和颈部受伤更普遍。