• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于测量步行能力的瑞士腰椎管狭窄症问卷身体功能量表的结构效度。

Construct validity of the physical function scale of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for the measurement of walking capacity.

作者信息

Tomkins Christy C, Battié Michele C, Hu Richard

机构信息

Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Aug 1;32(17):1896-901. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31811328eb.

DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31811328eb
PMID:17762299
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Measurement (validity) study using data from a prospective longitudinal study of lumbar spinal stenosis.

OBJECTIVE

Provide convergent and divergent validity evidence for the use of the Physical Function Scale of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for the measurement of walking capacity in persons with lumbar spinal stenosis. We were also interested in the association between the Physical Function Scale and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The Physical Function Scale has been used to assess walking capacity in persons with lumbar spinal stenosis; however, there have been limited studies investigating its psychometric properties. No validity studies have compared the Physical Function Scale and the ODI head to head.

METHODS

The Physical Function Scale was correlated with the ODI, Health Utilities Index, Centres for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Medical Outcomes Survey Social Support Scale, and an additional item from the Oxford Claudication Score.

RESULTS

As hypothesized, the Physical Function Scale was correlated highly with those instruments and items intended to measure walking capacity and minimally with those instruments intended to measure different constructs. The correlation between the Physical Function Scale and the ODI was r = 0.719.

CONCLUSION

Results support construct validity of the Physical Function Scale for the measurement of walking in an lumbar spinal stenosis population. However, it cannot be ascertained from the current study that the construct being measured is, indeed, walking capacity. Further research is warranted to investigate criterion validity evidence for the use of the Physical Function Scale in the measurement of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis, by examining the relationships between self-report and observational measures of walking.

摘要

研究设计

使用腰椎管狭窄症前瞻性纵向研究的数据进行测量(效度)研究。

目的

为瑞士腰椎管狭窄症问卷的身体功能量表用于测量腰椎管狭窄症患者的步行能力提供聚合效度和区分效度证据。我们还对身体功能量表与奥斯维斯特功能障碍指数(ODI)之间的关联感兴趣。

背景数据总结

身体功能量表已被用于评估腰椎管狭窄症患者的步行能力;然而,对其心理测量特性进行调查的研究有限。尚无效度研究对身体功能量表和ODI进行直接比较。

方法

将身体功能量表与ODI、健康效用指数、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表、医疗结果调查社会支持量表以及牛津间歇性跛行评分中的一个额外项目进行相关性分析。

结果

正如所假设的,身体功能量表与旨在测量步行能力的那些工具和项目高度相关,而与旨在测量不同结构的那些工具的相关性最小。身体功能量表与ODI之间的相关性为r = 0.719。

结论

结果支持身体功能量表在测量腰椎管狭窄症人群步行能力方面的结构效度。然而,从当前研究无法确定所测量的结构确实是步行能力。有必要进行进一步研究,通过检查自我报告的步行与观察到的步行之间的关系,来调查身体功能量表在测量腰椎管狭窄症步行能力方面的效标效度证据。

相似文献

1
Construct validity of the physical function scale of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for the measurement of walking capacity.用于测量步行能力的瑞士腰椎管狭窄症问卷身体功能量表的结构效度。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Aug 1;32(17):1896-901. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31811328eb.
2
Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.退行性腰椎管狭窄减压手术后患者临床评估与自我评估的前瞻性分析
Spine J. 2008 Mar-Apr;8(2):380-4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.010. Epub 2007 Mar 13.
3
The Balanced Inventory for Spinal Disorders: the validity of a disease specific questionnaire for evaluation of outcomes in patients with various spinal disorders.《脊柱疾病平衡量表》:一种疾病特异性问卷评估各种脊柱疾病患者结局的有效性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 15;34(18):1976-83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b07d6a.
4
Internal construct validity of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis questionnaire: Rasch analysis of a disease-specific outcome measure for lumbar spinal stenosis.瑞士腰椎狭窄问卷的内部结构效度:一种用于腰椎狭窄症的疾病特异性结局测量的 Rasch 分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 1;36(23):1969-76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fc9daf.
5
Depressive burden in the preoperative and early recovery phase predicts poorer surgery outcome among lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a one-year prospective follow-up study.术前和早期康复阶段的抑郁负担预测腰椎椎管狭窄症患者手术结局较差:一项为期一年的前瞻性随访研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Nov 1;34(23):2573-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b317bd.
6
Reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.瑞士腰椎管狭窄症问卷简体中文版对退变性腰椎管狭窄症患者的信度和效度
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 May 1;39(10):820-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000273.
7
Psychometric properties of selected tests in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症患者选择测试的心理测量特性。
Spine J. 2012 Oct;12(10):921-31. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
8
Predictors of objectively measured walking capacity in people with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.退行性腰椎管狭窄症患者客观测量的步行能力的预测因素
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(4):345-52. doi: 10.3233/BMR-130390.
9
A criterion measure of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis and its comparison with a treadmill protocol.一种用于腰椎椎管狭窄症的步行能力的标准测量方法及其与跑步机方案的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Oct 15;34(22):2444-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b03fc8.
10
Longitudinal construct validity and responsiveness of measures of walking capacity in individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症患者步行能力测量指标的纵向结构效度和反应性
Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):1936-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.030. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Pain Scales: What Are They and What Do They Mean.疼痛量表:它们是什么以及它们意味着什么。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024 Jan;28(1):11-25. doi: 10.1007/s11916-023-01195-2. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
2
Correlation between clinical scoring systems and quantitative MRI parameters in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.退行性腰椎管狭窄症临床评分系统与定量MRI参数之间的相关性
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Oct 20;35:102050. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.102050. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
The Lumbar Stenosis Prognostic Subgroups for Personalizing Care and Treatment (PROSPECTS) study: protocol for an inception cohort study.
腰椎狭窄症个性化护理和治疗的预后亚组(PROSPECTS)研究:一项起始队列研究方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jul 21;23(1):692. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05598-x.
4
Evaluating the Reproducibility of the Walking Test for Intermittent Claudication Associated with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.评估腰椎管狭窄症相关间歇性跛行步行试验的可重复性。
Asian Spine J. 2022 Jun;16(3):411-418. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0505. Epub 2021 May 10.
5
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Objective Measurement Scales and Ambulatory Status.腰椎管狭窄症:客观测量量表与步行状态
Asian Spine J. 2018 Aug;12(4):765-774. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.12.4.765. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
6
Correlation between the Oswestry Disability Index and objective measurements of walking capacity and performance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review.腰椎管狭窄症患者Oswestry功能障碍指数与步行能力及表现客观测量指标之间的相关性:一项系统文献综述
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jul;27(7):1604-1613. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5520-5. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
7
Evaluation of outcome measures for neurogenic claudication: A patient-centered approach.神经源性间歇性跛行结局指标的评估:以患者为中心的方法。
Neurology. 2015 Oct 6;85(14):1250-6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002000. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
8
Fundamentals of Clinical Outcomes Assessment for Spinal Disorders: Clinical Outcome Instruments and Applications.脊柱疾病临床结局评估基础:临床结局评估工具及其应用。
Global Spine J. 2015 Aug;5(4):329-38. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396046. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
9
Comparison between walking test and treadmill test for intermittent claudication associated with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.步行试验与平板运动试验用于腰椎管狭窄症相关间歇性跛行的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2015 Feb;24(2):327-32. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3511-8. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
10
Physical therapy interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.物理治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症:系统评价。
Phys Ther. 2013 Dec;93(12):1646-60. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120379. Epub 2013 Jul 25.