• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于腰椎椎管狭窄症的步行能力的标准测量方法及其与跑步机方案的比较。

A criterion measure of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis and its comparison with a treadmill protocol.

机构信息

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Oct 15;34(22):2444-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b03fc8.

DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b03fc8
PMID:19829259
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Measurement (validity) study.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and examine reproducibility of a criterion measure of walking capacity for use with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients, and use this criterion to examine the validity of a treadmill test for the same purpose.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

To date, there is no criterion measure of walking capacity advocated for use with LSS populations. Treadmill tests of walking have become more common in LSS literature and research, yet there is insufficient evidence to support the use of these tests as valid outcome measures. Therefore, our aim was to develop a criterion measure and to examine the validity of a treadmill protocol for the measurement of walking capacity in LSS.

METHODS

A criterion measure of walking capacity in LSS, the self-paced walking test (SPWT) was developed and its test-retest reproducibility examined. Validity of a treadmill test was then examined using the criterion measure for comparison.

RESULTS

The SPWT was found to be highly reproducible with a test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.98 for total distance walked, in a sample of subjects diagnosed with LSS (n = 33). Although the treadmill test was found to be highly correlated with the SPWT (r = 0.88), 89% of 45 subjects walked further during the SPWT than on the treadmill. Mean walking distances for the SPWT and treadmill test were 987.3 +/- 913.9 m and 611.3 +/- 666.0 m respectively, resulting in a significant difference (P < 0.05) between SPWT and treadmill tests.

CONCLUSION

The SPWT is presented as a feasible and reproducible criterion measure of walking capacity for use with LSS patients. Although a strong relationship was demonstrated between the treadmill protocol and the SPWT, a systematic bias was observed with patients walking significantly further in the SPWT (36% in mean).

摘要

研究设计

测量(有效性)研究。

目的

为腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者开发并检验一种行走能力的标准测量方法的可重复性,并使用该标准来检验跑步机测试的有效性。

背景资料概要

迄今为止,尚无推荐用于 LSS 人群的行走能力标准测量方法。跑步机行走测试在 LSS 文献和研究中越来越常见,但没有足够的证据支持这些测试作为有效的结果测量。因此,我们的目标是开发一种标准测量方法,并检验跑步机协议用于测量 LSS 患者行走能力的有效性。

方法

开发了一种腰椎管狭窄症患者行走能力的标准测量方法,即自主 paced 行走测试(SPWT),并检验了其测试-重测的可重复性。然后使用该标准测量方法来检验跑步机测试的有效性。

结果

在一组被诊断为 LSS 的受试者(n=33)中,SPWT 的总行走距离的测试-重测组内相关系数为 0.98,表明其具有高度的可重复性。尽管跑步机测试与 SPWT 高度相关(r=0.88),但 45 名受试者中有 89%在 SPWT 中行走的距离比在跑步机上更远。SPWT 和跑步机测试的平均行走距离分别为 987.3+/-913.9m 和 611.3+/-666.0m,SPWT 和跑步机测试之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。

结论

SPWT 是一种可行且可重复的腰椎管狭窄症患者行走能力的标准测量方法。尽管跑步机协议与 SPWT 之间显示出很强的关系,但观察到患者在 SPWT 中行走的距离明显更远(平均 36%),存在系统性偏差。

相似文献

1
A criterion measure of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis and its comparison with a treadmill protocol.一种用于腰椎椎管狭窄症的步行能力的标准测量方法及其与跑步机方案的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Oct 15;34(22):2444-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b03fc8.
2
Quantification of walking ability in subjects with neurogenic claudication from lumbar spinal stenosis--a comparative study.定量评估腰椎管狭窄症所致神经源性间歇性跛行患者的步行能力——一项对比研究。
Spine J. 2012 Feb;12(2):101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.12.006. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
3
Construct validity of the physical function scale of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for the measurement of walking capacity.用于测量步行能力的瑞士腰椎管狭窄症问卷身体功能量表的结构效度。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Aug 1;32(17):1896-901. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31811328eb.
4
Walking assessment in people with lumbar spinal stenosis: capacity, performance, and self-report measures.腰椎管狭窄症患者的步行评估:能力、表现和自我报告测量。
Spine J. 2011 Sep;11(9):816-23. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.10.019. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
5
Longitudinal construct validity and responsiveness of measures of walking capacity in individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症患者步行能力测量指标的纵向结构效度和反应性
Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):1936-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.030. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
6
Development and validation of a quality of life scale specific for lumbar spinal stenosis.开发并验证一种针对腰椎椎管狭窄症的特异性生活质量量表。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21):E1407-14. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821fd4b1.
7
Functional mobility performance in an elderly population with lumbar spinal stenosis.老年腰椎管狭窄症患者的功能性活动能力表现
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Apr;82(4):464-7. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.20828.
8
Walking during daily life can be validly and responsively assessed in subjects with a spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤患者日常生活中的步行情况可以得到有效且灵敏的评估。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Feb;23(2):117-24. doi: 10.1177/1545968308320640. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
9
Accelerometry in persons with multiple sclerosis: measurement of physical activity or walking mobility?加速度计在多发性硬化症患者中的应用:测量身体活动还是行走能力?
J Neurol Sci. 2010 Mar 15;290(1-2):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2009.12.021. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
10
Bone metabolism in postmenopausal women with lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of bone mineral density and bone turnover markers.绝经后腰椎管狭窄症女性的骨代谢:骨密度和骨转换标志物分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Oct 15;33(22):2435-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181829fca.

引用本文的文献

1
The Boot Camp treatment program for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis in Danish chiropractic care-a feasibility study.丹麦整脊治疗中腰椎管狭窄症患者的新兵训练营治疗方案——一项可行性研究
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Jul 30;11(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01687-5.
2
Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic pain and neurogenic claudication related to lumbar spinal stenosis.经颅直流电刺激对与腰椎管狭窄相关的慢性疼痛和神经源性间歇性跛行的疗效。
Neurol Sci. 2024 Feb;45(2):769-782. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-07248-z. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
3
Validity of outcome measures used in randomized clinical trials and observational studies in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
用于退行性腰椎管狭窄症随机临床试验和观察性研究的结局测量的有效性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 19;13(1):1068. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27218-3.
4
Effectiveness of a 6-week specific rehabilitation program combining education and exercises on walking capacity in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: a randomized controlled clinical trial protocol.一项 6 周的特定康复计划,结合教育和运动,对伴有神经源性跛行的腰椎管狭窄症患者的步行能力的有效性:一项随机对照临床试验方案。
Trials. 2022 Dec 27;23(1):1046. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07011-3.
5
Gait Variability to Phenotype Common Orthopedic Gait Impairments Using Wearable Sensors.使用可穿戴传感器对常见骨科步态障碍进行步态变异性与表型分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 29;22(23):9301. doi: 10.3390/s22239301.
6
Best Practices for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment 2.0 (MIST): Consensus Guidance from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN).微创腰椎管狭窄症治疗2.0最佳实践(MIST):美国疼痛与神经科学学会(ASPN)的共识指南。
J Pain Res. 2022 May 5;15:1325-1354. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S355285. eCollection 2022.
7
Evaluating the Reproducibility of the Walking Test for Intermittent Claudication Associated with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.评估腰椎管狭窄症相关间歇性跛行步行试验的可重复性。
Asian Spine J. 2022 Jun;16(3):411-418. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0505. Epub 2021 May 10.
8
Smartphone-Based Self-Assessment of Objective Functional Impairment (6-Minute Walking Test) in Patients Undergoing Epidural Steroid Injection.接受硬膜外类固醇注射患者基于智能手机的客观功能障碍自我评估(6分钟步行试验)
Neurospine. 2020 Mar;17(1):136-142. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040022.011. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
9
Objective activity tracking in spine surgery: a prospective feasibility study with a low-cost consumer grade wearable accelerometer.脊柱手术中的客观活动跟踪:使用低成本消费级可穿戴加速度计的前瞻性可行性研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 18;10(1):4939. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61893-4.
10
Effects of pre-surgery physiotherapy on walking ability and lower extremity strength in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorder: Secondary outcomes of the PREPARE randomised controlled trial.术前物理治疗对退行性腰椎疾病患者行走能力和下肢力量的影响:PREPARE 随机对照试验的次要结局。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Oct 24;20(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2850-3.