• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估腰椎管狭窄症相关间歇性跛行步行试验的可重复性。

Evaluating the Reproducibility of the Walking Test for Intermittent Claudication Associated with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

作者信息

Tanishima Shinji, Weishi Li, Jianzhong Hu, Jie Zhao, Huilin Yang, Nagashima Hideki

机构信息

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Sensory of Motor Organs, School of Medicine, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Asian Spine J. 2022 Jun;16(3):411-418. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0505. Epub 2021 May 10.

DOI:10.31616/asj.2020.0505
PMID:33957742
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9260410/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

This is a multicenter, prospective study.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of the walking test for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Walking test is one of the useful procedures to investigate cauda equina syndrome with lumbar spinal stenosis. One the other hands, there were few studies to investigate the reproducibility of this test.

METHODS

In this study, we prospectively examined 70 LSS patients with intermittent claudication symptoms at a multicenter outpatient clinic. A walking test was administered at baseline and week 4 to assess patients' walking distance and lower limb pain and numbness. Immediately after the walking test, patients were asked to use the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to rate their pain and numbness in the front, back, outside, inside, and hip of the lower legs. The reproducibility of the walking test was evaluated using Cohen's κ analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Meanwhile, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis (SSS) Questionnaire was used to evaluate the severity of the stenosis.

RESULTS

The walking distance ICC at baseline and at week 4 remained unchanged at 0.7, with acceptable interobserver reliabilities for lower limb pain and numbness in both legs. The average VAS score for lower leg pain was 23.2±25.2 mm at baseline and 27.4±28.8 mm at week 4, while the corresponding average VAS score for numbness was 23.4±26.7 mm at baseline and 24.8±25.2 mm at week 4. The ICC score was 0.7 for leg pain and 0.7 for numbness. The mean SSS was 30.2±5.5 at baseline and 29.2±5.2 at week 4, and there was no significant difference in the severity.

CONCLUSIONS

The walking test for LSS has acceptable reproducibility.

摘要

研究设计

这是一项多中心前瞻性研究。

目的

本研究旨在评估腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者步行试验的可重复性。

文献综述

步行试验是研究腰椎管狭窄症马尾神经综合征的有用方法之一。另一方面,很少有研究探讨该试验的可重复性。

方法

在本研究中,我们在多中心门诊对70例有间歇性跛行症状的LSS患者进行了前瞻性检查。在基线和第4周进行步行试验,以评估患者的步行距离以及下肢疼痛和麻木情况。步行试验结束后,立即要求患者使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对小腿前侧、后侧、外侧、内侧及臀部的疼痛和麻木程度进行评分。使用Cohen's κ分析和组内相关系数(ICC)评估步行试验的可重复性。同时,使用瑞士腰椎管狭窄症(SSS)问卷评估狭窄的严重程度。

结果

基线和第4周时步行距离的ICC均保持在0.7不变,双腿下肢疼痛和麻木的观察者间信度均可接受。小腿疼痛的平均VAS评分在基线时为23.2±25.2mm,第4周时为27.4±28.8mm,而相应的麻木平均VAS评分在基线时为23.4±26.7mm,第4周时为24.8±25.2mm。腿痛和麻木的ICC评分均为0.7。基线时SSS平均评分为30.2±5.5,第4周时为29.2±5.2,严重程度无显著差异。

结论

LSS患者的步行试验具有可接受的可重复性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8fb/9260410/7ce9e032cadc/asj-2020-0505f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8fb/9260410/349daf1aaeae/asj-2020-0505f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8fb/9260410/1a601fa5eb2d/asj-2020-0505f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8fb/9260410/783f0b697680/asj-2020-0505f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8fb/9260410/7ce9e032cadc/asj-2020-0505f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8fb/9260410/349daf1aaeae/asj-2020-0505f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8fb/9260410/1a601fa5eb2d/asj-2020-0505f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8fb/9260410/783f0b697680/asj-2020-0505f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8fb/9260410/7ce9e032cadc/asj-2020-0505f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Reproducibility of the Walking Test for Intermittent Claudication Associated with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.评估腰椎管狭窄症相关间歇性跛行步行试验的可重复性。
Asian Spine J. 2022 Jun;16(3):411-418. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0505. Epub 2021 May 10.
2
A diagnostic support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis: a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire.一种用于腰椎管狭窄症的诊断支持工具:一份自我管理、自我报告的病史问卷。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Oct 30;8:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-102.
3
Clinical Efficacy of Neurotropin for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Low Back Pain.神经妥乐平治疗伴有腰痛的腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效
Pain Ther. 2023 Apr;12(2):461-473. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00472-z. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
4
Clinical usefulness of assessing lumbar somatosensory evoked potentials in lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical article.评估腰椎管狭窄症中腰段体感诱发电位的临床实用性。临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Jul;11(1):71-8. doi: 10.3171/2009.3.SPINE08513.
5
Objective functional assessment using the "Timed Up and Go" test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.采用“起立-行走计时测试”评估腰椎椎管狭窄症患者的功能。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E4. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18618.
6
The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.穿梭步行试验、瑞士腰椎管狭窄症问卷、牛津腰椎管狭窄症评分及Oswestry功能障碍指数在腰椎管狭窄症患者评估中的可靠性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jan 1;27(1):84-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200201010-00020.
7
Associations between psychological factors and daily step count in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.心理因素与腰椎管狭窄症患者日常步数的相关性。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Oct;38(10):1519-1527. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1855685. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
8
Comparison of the history and physical examination for hip osteoarthritis and lumbar spinal stenosis.髋关节骨关节炎与腰椎椎管狭窄症的病史与体格检查比较。
Spine J. 2019 Jun;19(6):1009-1018. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
9
Clinical classification criteria for neurogenic claudication caused by lumbar spinal stenosis. The N-CLASS criteria.腰椎管狭窄症所致神经源性间歇性跛行的临床分类标准。N-CLASS 标准。
Spine J. 2018 Jun;18(6):941-947. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
10
Effect of a prototype lumbar spinal stenosis belt versus a lumbar support on walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.原型腰椎狭窄带与腰部支撑对腰椎狭窄症步行能力的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Spine J. 2019 Mar;19(3):386-394. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Response to: Evaluating the Reproducibility of the Walking Test for Intermittent Claudication Associated with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.对《评估间歇性跛行与腰椎管狭窄症步行试验的可重复性》的回应
Asian Spine J. 2022 Aug;16(4):613-614. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0290.r2. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
2
Letter to the Editor: Evaluating the Reproducibility of the Walking Test for Intermittent Claudication Associated with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.致编辑的信:评估与腰椎管狭窄相关的间歇性跛行步行试验的可重复性
Asian Spine J. 2022 Aug;16(4):611-612. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0290.r1. Epub 2022 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison between walking test and treadmill test for intermittent claudication associated with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.步行试验与平板运动试验用于腰椎管狭窄症相关间歇性跛行的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2015 Feb;24(2):327-32. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3511-8. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
2
Three-step treadmill test and McKenzie mechanical diagnosis and therapy to establish directional preference in a patient with lumbar spinal stenosis: a case report.三步跑步机试验和麦肯齐力学诊断与治疗以确定一名腰椎管狭窄症患者的方向偏好:病例报告
J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Feb;19(1):35-41. doi: 10.1179/2042618610Y.0000000002.
3
Quantification of walking ability in subjects with neurogenic claudication from lumbar spinal stenosis--a comparative study.
定量评估腰椎管狭窄症所致神经源性间歇性跛行患者的步行能力——一项对比研究。
Spine J. 2012 Feb;12(2):101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.12.006. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
4
Validity and reproducibility of self-report measures of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症患者行走能力自评量表的有效性和可重复性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 1;35(23):2097-102. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f5e13b.
5
The clinical effect of gait load test in two level lumbar spinal stenosis.两级腰椎管狭窄症步态负荷试验的临床效果
Asian Spine J. 2009 Dec;3(2):96-100. doi: 10.4184/asj.2009.3.2.96. Epub 2009 Dec 31.
6
A criterion measure of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis and its comparison with a treadmill protocol.一种用于腰椎椎管狭窄症的步行能力的标准测量方法及其与跑步机方案的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Oct 15;34(22):2444-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b03fc8.
7
The diagnostic value of a treadmill test in predicting lumbar spinal stenosis.平板运动试验对预测腰椎管狭窄症的诊断价值。
Eur Spine J. 2008 May;17(5):686-90. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0593-1. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
8
Construct validity of the physical function scale of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for the measurement of walking capacity.用于测量步行能力的瑞士腰椎管狭窄症问卷身体功能量表的结构效度。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Aug 1;32(17):1896-901. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31811328eb.
9
Comparison of the predictive value of myelography, computed tomography and MRI on the treadmill test in lumbar spinal stenosis.脊髓造影、计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像对腰椎管狭窄症跑步机试验预测价值的比较。
Yonsei Med J. 2005 Dec 31;46(6):806-11. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2005.46.6.806.
10
Functional mobility performance in an elderly population with lumbar spinal stenosis.老年腰椎管狭窄症患者的功能性活动能力表现
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Apr;82(4):464-7. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.20828.