Towner Dena R, Ciotti Mary C
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California 95817, USA.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;50(3):563-81. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31811eaa39.
Operative vaginal delivery has been maligned since the days of W.J. Little with the word "forceps" becoming nearly synonymous with "Birth Injury" and "Cerebral Palsy." However in his presentation to the Obstetrical Society of London in 1861, Little's emphasis was on difficult labors being the culprit in subsequent disabilities in the offspring. Instrumented deliveries in that era were the end result of a long, obstructed labor performed for maternal benefit and to avoid a destructive procedure to the fetus thus allowing a chance at life. If there had been a normal progress in labor, operative assistance for delivery would not have been needed. Thus, was it the instrument or the obstructed labor that led to fetal injury? In this article, we will review what injuries to the fetus and the mother can be directly attributable to the instrument. We will explore the processes of labor, conduct of labor management, and concurrent fetal factors that can modulate the occurrence of birth trauma. Evidence regarding inexperience and improper use as contributing to injury will also be explored.
自W.J.利特尔时代起,手术阴道分娩就备受诟病,“产钳”一词几乎成了“分娩损伤”和“脑瘫”的同义词。然而,在1861年向伦敦妇产科学会的报告中,利特尔强调难产是导致后代随后出现残疾的罪魁祸首。那个时代的器械分娩是为了产妇利益而进行的漫长、梗阻性分娩的最终结果,是为了避免对胎儿进行破坏性手术,从而给胎儿一个生存的机会。如果分娩过程正常进展,就不需要手术助产。那么,是器械还是梗阻性分娩导致了胎儿损伤呢?在本文中,我们将回顾哪些胎儿和母亲的损伤可直接归因于器械。我们将探讨分娩过程、分娩管理的实施以及可能调节产伤发生的并发胎儿因素。还将探讨关于经验不足和使用不当导致损伤的证据。