Suppr超能文献

产钳助产:是分娩损伤的一个原因,还是并非如此?

Operative vaginal delivery: a cause of birth injury or is it?

作者信息

Towner Dena R, Ciotti Mary C

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California 95817, USA.

出版信息

Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;50(3):563-81. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31811eaa39.

Abstract

Operative vaginal delivery has been maligned since the days of W.J. Little with the word "forceps" becoming nearly synonymous with "Birth Injury" and "Cerebral Palsy." However in his presentation to the Obstetrical Society of London in 1861, Little's emphasis was on difficult labors being the culprit in subsequent disabilities in the offspring. Instrumented deliveries in that era were the end result of a long, obstructed labor performed for maternal benefit and to avoid a destructive procedure to the fetus thus allowing a chance at life. If there had been a normal progress in labor, operative assistance for delivery would not have been needed. Thus, was it the instrument or the obstructed labor that led to fetal injury? In this article, we will review what injuries to the fetus and the mother can be directly attributable to the instrument. We will explore the processes of labor, conduct of labor management, and concurrent fetal factors that can modulate the occurrence of birth trauma. Evidence regarding inexperience and improper use as contributing to injury will also be explored.

摘要

自W.J.利特尔时代起,手术阴道分娩就备受诟病,“产钳”一词几乎成了“分娩损伤”和“脑瘫”的同义词。然而,在1861年向伦敦妇产科学会的报告中,利特尔强调难产是导致后代随后出现残疾的罪魁祸首。那个时代的器械分娩是为了产妇利益而进行的漫长、梗阻性分娩的最终结果,是为了避免对胎儿进行破坏性手术,从而给胎儿一个生存的机会。如果分娩过程正常进展,就不需要手术助产。那么,是器械还是梗阻性分娩导致了胎儿损伤呢?在本文中,我们将回顾哪些胎儿和母亲的损伤可直接归因于器械。我们将探讨分娩过程、分娩管理的实施以及可能调节产伤发生的并发胎儿因素。还将探讨关于经验不足和使用不当导致损伤的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验