Suppr超能文献

评估芬兰成年人的一个单一牙科焦虑问题。

Evaluating a single dental anxiety question in Finnish adults.

作者信息

Viinikangas Aki, Lahti Satu, Yuan Siyang, Pietilä Ilpo, Freeman Ruth, Humphris Gerry

机构信息

Department of Community Dentistry, University of Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Acta Odontol Scand. 2007 Aug;65(4):236-40. doi: 10.1080/00016350701395932.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the psychometric properties (criterion validity, construct validity, sensitivity, and specificity) of a single-item question screening for dental anxiety in a Finnish adult population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 823 subjects, ranging in age from 18 to 87 years, answered a questionnaire comprising sections assessing the respondents' demographic profile and dental attendance patterns. A single dental anxiety question and the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) were included. The final response rate was 85%.

RESULTS

Eight percent of the sample was highly dentally anxious using the MDAS cut-off point of 19 or above. Twelve percent of the respondents rated themselves as "very scared" on the single-item question. The percentage agreement between the single-item question and the MDAS was 93; the Kappa coefficient was 0.63. Specificity of the single question was 0.95 while sensitivity was 0.80 using the MDAS dichotomous classification. The single-item question related to age (p<0.001), gender (p<0.001), and dental attendance (p<0.001), as predicted.

CONCLUSIONS

The single question has good validity, specificity, and sensitivity and may be used with confidence to assess dental fear in such situations as national health surveys or in routine dental practice where a multi-item dental anxiety questionnaire is not feasible.

摘要

目的

评估一项针对芬兰成年人群体的单项目问题筛查牙科焦虑症的心理测量特性(效标效度、结构效度、敏感性和特异性)。

材料与方法

共有823名年龄在18至87岁之间的受试者回答了一份问卷,问卷包括评估受访者人口统计学特征和看牙模式的部分。问卷包含一个单一的牙科焦虑问题和改良牙科焦虑量表(MDAS)。最终回复率为85%。

结果

以MDAS 19分及以上为临界值,8%的样本存在高度牙科焦虑。12%的受访者在单项目问题上给自己评为“非常害怕”。单项目问题与MDAS之间的百分比一致性为93;卡帕系数为0.63。使用MDAS二分法分类时,单问题的特异性为0.95,敏感性为0.80。如预期的那样,单项目问题与年龄(p<0.001)、性别(p<0.001)和看牙情况(p<0.001)相关。

结论

该单问题具有良好的效度、特异性和敏感性,可放心用于评估国家健康调查或常规牙科诊疗等情况下的牙科恐惧,在这些情况下使用多项目牙科焦虑问卷不可行。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验