Suppr超能文献

尿路结石的成分及临床测定的硬度

Composition and clinically determined hardness of urinary tract stones.

作者信息

Ringdén Ida, Tiselius Hans-Göran

机构信息

Renal Stone Unit, Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital at Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2007;41(4):316-23. doi: 10.1080/00365590601154551.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To derive hardness factors for crystal phases of urinary tract stones and describe the hardness pattern in a stone population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a retrospective study, recordings from patients treated with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) (stone surface area < or = 100 mm2) were used to derive hardness factors. The number of re-treatments, the number of shock waves and the energy index (the voltage in kilovolts multiplied by the number of shock waves) required for a satisfactory stone disintegration were assumed to reflect the hardness. The stone composition in 2100 patients provided the basis for an average hardness pattern. A hardness index was calculated from the fraction of each crystal phase and its hardness factor.

RESULTS

The hardness factors were as follows: calcium oxalate monohydrate, 1.3; calcium oxalate dehydrate, 1.0; hydroxyapatite, 1.1; brushite, 2.2; uric acid/urate, 1.0; cystine, 2.4; carbonate apatite, 1.3; magnesium ammonium phosphate, 1.0; and mixed infection stones, 1.0. The hardness index for 114 stones (surface area 100-200 mm2) corresponded reasonably well to the ESWL treatment efforts. Calcium oxalate monohydrate, calcium oxalate dihydrate and hydroxyapatite were the most frequently encountered crystal phases in all 2100 stones. Only 21% of the stones were composed of only one crystal phase. There were two, three and more than three crystal phases in 26%, 38% and 15% of the stones, respectively. The hardness index calculated for 2100 stones ranged between 0.70 and 2.33, with a mean (SD) of 1.18 (0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

The hardness factors and hardness index derived in this study might be useful for describing the stone situation in individual patients and groups of patients and for comparison of various treatment strategies.

摘要

目的

得出尿路结石晶体相的硬度因子,并描述结石群体中的硬度模式。

材料与方法

在一项回顾性研究中,使用接受体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗(结石表面积≤100 mm²)患者的记录来得出硬度因子。假定满意的结石崩解所需的再次治疗次数、冲击波次数和能量指数(千伏电压乘以冲击波次数)反映硬度。2100例患者的结石成分构成了平均硬度模式的基础。根据各晶体相的占比及其硬度因子计算硬度指数。

结果

硬度因子如下:一水草酸钙,1.3;二水草酸钙,1.0;羟基磷灰石,1.1;透钙磷石,2.2;尿酸/尿酸盐,1.0;胱氨酸,2.4;碳酸磷灰石,1.3;磷酸镁铵,1.0;以及混合感染结石,1.0。114颗结石(表面积100 - 200 mm²)的硬度指数与ESWL治疗效果相当吻合。一水草酸钙、二水草酸钙和羟基磷灰石是所有2100颗结石中最常见的晶体相。仅21%的结石由单一晶体相组成。分别有26%、38%和15%的结石含有两种、三种及三种以上晶体相。2100颗结石计算得出的硬度指数在0.70至2.33之间,平均(标准差)为1.18(0.15)。

结论

本研究得出的硬度因子和硬度指数可能有助于描述个体患者和患者群体的结石情况,以及比较各种治疗策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验