Suppr超能文献

肺静脉前庭隔离治疗心房颤动前后,心内膜左心房自主神经节刺激诱发的迷走反应。

Vagal responses induced by endocardial left atrial autonomic ganglion stimulation before and after pulmonary vein antrum isolation for atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Verma Atul, Saliba Walid I, Lakkireddy Dhanumjaya, Burkhardt J David, Cummings Jennifer E, Wazni Oussama M, Belden William A, Thal Sergio, Schweikert Robert A, Martin David O, Tchou Patrick J, Natale Andrea

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Section of Electrophysiology, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2007 Sep;4(9):1177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.04.023. Epub 2007 May 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Elimination of vagal inputs into the left atrium (LA) may be necessary for successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). These vagal inputs are clustered in autonomic ganglia (AG) that are close to the pulmonary vein antrum (PVA) borders, but whether standard intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided PVA isolation (PVAI) affects these inputs is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess whether standard ICE-guided PVAI affects vagal responses induced by endocardial AG stimulation in the LA.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients undergoing first-time PVAI (group 1) and 20 consecutive patients undergoing repeat PVAI for AF recurrence (group 2) were enrolled in the study. Before ablation, electrical stimulation (20 Hz, pulse duration 10 ms, voltage range 12-20 V) was performed through an 8-mm-tip ablation catheter. Based on prior data, regions around all four PVA borders were carefully mapped and stimulated to localize AG inputs. A positive stimulated vagal response was defined as atrioventricular (AV) block, asystole, or increase in mean RR interval by >50%. Locations of positive vagal responses were recorded wth biplane fluoroscopy and CARTO. All patients then underwent standard ICE-guided PVAI by an operator blinded to the locations of vagal responses. Stimulation of the AG locations was then repeated postablation.

RESULTS

Patients (age 54 +/- 11 years, 30% female, ejection fraction 54% +/- 7%) had a history of paroxysmal (75%) and persistent (25%) AF. In group 1, vagal responses were induced in all 20 patients around a mean of 3.8 +/- 0.4 PVAs per patient. The most common response was asystole (53%), mean RR slowing >50% (28%), and AV block (20%). Postablation, vagal responses could no longer be induced in all 20 patients. A diminished response was induced (RR slowing <50%) in 2/20 patients around one PVA each. In group 2, vagal responses were not induced in any of the 20 repeat patients. Stimulation capture postablation was confirmed because transient, nonsustained (<30 seconds) AF or atrial flutter was induced in all 40 patients with stimulation, whether vagal responses were induced or not.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard ICE-guided PVAI eliminates vagal responses induced by AG stimulation. Responses are not seen in patients presenting for repeat PVAI, despite clinical recurrence of AF.

摘要

背景

消除迷走神经传入左心房(LA)可能是成功进行房颤(AF)导管消融所必需的。这些迷走神经传入集中在靠近肺静脉窦(PVA)边界的自主神经节(AG)中,但标准心内超声心动图(ICE)引导下的PVA隔离(PVAI)是否会影响这些传入尚不清楚。

目的

本研究旨在评估标准ICE引导下的PVAI是否会影响LA内心内膜AG刺激诱发的迷走反应。

方法

连续纳入20例首次接受PVAI的患者(第1组)和20例因房颤复发接受重复PVAI的患者(第2组)。在消融前,通过8mm尖端消融导管进行电刺激(20Hz,脉冲持续时间10ms,电压范围12 - 20V)。根据先前数据,仔细标测并刺激所有四个PVA边界周围区域以定位AG传入。阳性刺激迷走反应定义为房室(AV)阻滞、心搏停止或平均RR间期增加>50%。通过双平面荧光透视和CARTO记录阳性迷走反应的位置。然后所有患者由对迷走反应位置不知情的操作者进行标准ICE引导下的PVAI。消融后重复刺激AG位置。

结果

患者(年龄54±11岁,30%为女性,射血分数54%±7%)有阵发性(75%)和持续性(25%)房颤病史。在第1组中,所有20例患者均诱发了迷走反应,每位患者平均约3.8±0.4个PVA周围出现反应。最常见的反应是心搏停止(53%)、平均RR减慢>50%(28%)和AV阻滞(20%)。消融后,所有20例患者均不再能诱发迷走反应。2/20例患者在每个PVA周围出现反应减弱(RR减慢<50%)。在第2组中,20例重复手术患者均未诱发迷走反应。消融后刺激捕捉得到证实,因为在所有40例接受刺激的患者中均诱发了短暂的、非持续性(<30秒)房颤或房扑,无论是否诱发迷走反应。

结论

标准ICE引导下的PVAI消除了AG刺激诱发的迷走反应。尽管房颤临床复发,但接受重复PVAI的患者未出现迷走反应。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验