Minkovitz Cynthia S, Strobino Donna, Mistry Kamila B, Scharfstein Daniel O, Grason Holly, Hou William, Ialongo Nicholas, Guyer Bernard
Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, E4636, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Pediatrics. 2007 Sep;120(3):e658-68. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1205.
We sought to determine whether Healthy Steps for Young Children has sustained treatment effects at 5.5 years, given early findings demonstrating enhanced quality of care and improvements in selected parenting practices.
Healthy Steps was a clinical trial that incorporated developmental specialists and enhanced developmental services into pediatric care in the first 3 years of life. A total of 5565 children were enrolled at birth and followed through 5.5 years. Healthy Steps was evaluated at 6 randomization and 9 quasi-experimental sites. Computer-assisted telephone interviews were conducted with mothers when Healthy Steps children were 5.5 years of age. Outcomes included experiences seeking care, parent response to child misbehavior, perception of child's behavior, and parenting practices to promote development and safety. Logistic regression was used to estimate overall effects of Healthy Steps, adjusting for site and baseline demographic characteristics.
A total of 3165 (56.9%) families responded to interviews (usual care: n = 1441; Healthy Steps: n = 1724). Families that had received Healthy Steps services were more satisfied with care (agreed that pediatrician/nurse practitioner provided support, 82.0% vs 79.0%; odds ratio: 1.25 [95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.53]) and more likely to receive needed anticipatory guidance (54.9% vs 49.2%; odds ratio: 1.33 [95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.57]) (all P < .05). They also had increased odds of remaining at the original practice (65.1% vs 61.4%; odds ratio: 1.19 [95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.39]). Healthy Steps families reported reduced odds of using severe discipline (slap in face/spank with object, 10.1% vs 14.1%; odds ratio: 0.68 [95% confidence interval: 0.54-0.86]) and increased odds of often/almost always negotiating with their child (59.8% vs 56.3%; odds ratio: 1.20 [95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.39]). They had greater odds of reporting a clinical or borderline concern regarding their child's behavior (18.1% vs 14.8%; odds ratio: 1.35 [95% confidence interval: 1.10-1.64]) and their child reading books (59.4% vs 53.6%; odds ratio: 1.16 [95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.35]). There were no effects on safety practices.
Sustained treatment effects, albeit modest, are consistent with early findings. Universal, practice-based interventions can enhance quality of care for families with young children and can improve selected parenting practices beyond the duration of the intervention.
鉴于早期研究结果显示儿童保健质量有所提高,且部分育儿方式得到改善,我们试图确定“幼儿健康成长计划”在5.5岁时是否仍具有持续的治疗效果。
“幼儿健康成长计划”是一项临床试验,在儿童出生后的前3年将发育专家和强化发育服务纳入儿科护理。共有5565名儿童在出生时入组,并随访至5.5岁。该计划在6个随机分组和9个准实验地点进行了评估。当“幼儿健康成长计划”的儿童5.5岁时,对其母亲进行了计算机辅助电话访谈。结果包括寻求护理的经历、父母对孩子不当行为的反应、对孩子行为的认知以及促进发育和安全的育儿方式。采用逻辑回归分析来估计“幼儿健康成长计划”的总体效果,并对地点和基线人口统计学特征进行了调整。
共有3165个家庭(56.9%)回应了访谈(常规护理组:n = 1441;“幼儿健康成长计划”组:n = 1724)。接受“幼儿健康成长计划”服务的家庭对护理更满意(同意儿科医生/执业护士提供支持的比例为82.0%,而常规护理组为79.0%;优势比:1.25 [95%置信区间:1.02 - 1.53]),更有可能获得所需的预期指导(54.9%对49.2%;优势比:1.33 [95%置信区间:1.13 - 1.57])(所有P < 0.05)。他们留在原医疗机构的几率也有所增加(65.1%对61.4%;优势比:1.19 [95%置信区间:1.01 - 1.39])。“幼儿健康成长计划”组的家庭报告称,使用严厉管教的几率降低(用手打孩子脸/用物品打屁股的比例为10.1%,而常规护理组为14.1%;优势比:0.68 [95%置信区间:0.54 - 0.86]),经常/几乎总是与孩子协商的几率增加(59.8%对56.3%;优势比:1.20 [95%置信区间:1.03 - 1.39])。他们报告对孩子行为存在临床或临界担忧的几率更高(18.1%对14.8%;优势比:1.35 [95%置信区间:1.10 - 1.64]),孩子读书的几率也更高(59.4%对53.6%;优势比:1.16 [95%置信区间:1.00 - 1.35])。对安全措施没有影响。
尽管效果有限,但持续的治疗效果与早期研究结果一致。基于实践的普遍干预措施可以提高幼儿家庭的护理质量,并能在干预期结束后改善部分育儿方式。