Belen Lucien, Habrard Mickaël, Micallef Jean Paul, Perrey Stéphane, Le Gallais Daniel
Laboratoire Efficience et Déficience Motrices, EA 2991, Faculté des Sciences du Sport, Université de Montpellier 1, 700 Avenue du Pic Saint Loup, 34090, Montpellier, France.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Dec;101(6):721-6. doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0547-z. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
The primary aim of our study was to examine supra-maximal cycling performance and related mechanical variables in trained cyclists using a new prototype chainring (PC) designed to produce a higher mean net torque (T (N mean)) than a standard chainring (SC). The main feature of the PC is that crank-arm alignment and lever-arm length change as a function of the crank angle during the pedaling cycle. The PC presents two features theorized to effect cycling performance: (1) out of line of pedal cranks resulting in an decrease in the dead points, and (2) a change in crank arm length inducing a torque different from that of SC during the down- and up-stroke of the pedaling cycle. To investigate this theory, we examined eight male cyclists who performed a 1-km "all-out" cycling test in the following order: SC, PC, and SC. Performance was measured as the time (s) to complete the 1-km test. Mechanical variables included torque (N m(-1)), crank velocity (rad s(-1)), and power output (W). We performed our statistical analysis using a two-way ANOVA for repeated measurements and Newman-Keuls post hoc assessment. Our results showed that performance was similar for SC (69.41 +/- 6.69 s) and PC (73.33 +/- 4.58 s). Torque, crank velocity, and power output were also similar throughout (P > 0.05). We conclude that despite the theoretically benefits proposed by the inventors the new PC investigated in our study failed to improve cycling performance or mechanical variables during a supramaximal test when compared with SC.