• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年龄与阅读:干扰因素的影响

Age and reading: the impact of distraction.

作者信息

Connelly S L, Hasher L, Zacks R T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 1991 Dec;6(4):533-41. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.6.4.533.

DOI:10.1037//0882-7974.6.4.533
PMID:1777141
Abstract

Older and younger adults read aloud and answered questions about texts that did or did not have distracting material interspersed amid target text. When present, distracting material occurred in a different type font from that of target material. Across 2 experiments, distracting material was meaningless, meaningful but unrelated to the text, or meaningful and text related. Subjects were instructed to attend only to the target text. Reading time measures indicated that compared with younger adults, older adults have a more difficult time ignoring the distracting information, particularly information meaningfully related to target text. Verbal ability differences among older, but not younger, adults moderated distraction effects. Age differences in inhibitory attentional mechanisms were considered as processes influencing distraction effects.

摘要

老年人和年轻人朗读并回答有关文本的问题,这些文本中穿插或未穿插干扰性材料。若有干扰性材料,其字体与目标材料不同。在两项实验中,干扰性材料分别为无意义的、有意义但与文本无关的、有意义且与文本相关的。受试者被指示只关注目标文本。阅读时间测量结果表明,与年轻人相比,老年人更难忽略干扰信息,尤其是与目标文本有意义相关的信息。老年人(而非年轻人)的语言能力差异调节了干扰效应。抑制性注意机制的年龄差异被视为影响干扰效应的过程。

相似文献

1
Age and reading: the impact of distraction.年龄与阅读:干扰因素的影响
Psychol Aging. 1991 Dec;6(4):533-41. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.6.4.533.
2
Aging and interference in story recall.衰老与故事回忆中的干扰。
Exp Aging Res. 2012;38(1):20-41. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2012.636724.
3
Breaking the waves: age differences in electrical brain activity when reading text with distractors.
Psychol Aging. 2003 Mar;18(1):126-39. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.18.1.126.
4
Orienting tasks as moderators of narrative and expository text recall in adulthood.将定向任务作为成年人叙述性和说明性文本回忆的调节因素。
Psychol Aging. 1993 Mar;8(1):56-8. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.8.1.56.
5
Effects of text genre and verbal ability on adult age differences in sensitivity to text structure.文本体裁和语言能力对成年人在文本结构敏感性方面年龄差异的影响。
Psychol Aging. 1989 Jun;4(2):247-50. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.4.2.247.
6
Age differences in reading with distraction: sensory or inhibitory deficits?阅读时注意力分散的年龄差异:感觉缺陷还是抑制缺陷?
Psychol Aging. 2010 Dec;25(4):886-97. doi: 10.1037/a0019508.
7
Effects of thematic information on script memory in young and old adults.主题信息对年轻人和老年人脚本记忆的影响。
Psychol Aging. 1988 Sep;3(3):292-9. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.3.3.292.
8
Eye movements of young and older adults while reading with distraction.年轻人和老年人在阅读时伴有干扰情况下的眼球运动。
Psychol Aging. 2006 Mar;21(1):32-9. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.32.
9
Age and the availability of inferences.
Psychol Aging. 1992 Mar;7(1):56-64. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.7.1.56.
10
How does background information improve memory for text content?背景信息如何提高对文本内容的记忆?
Mem Cognit. 2002 Jul;30(5):768-78. doi: 10.3758/bf03196432.

引用本文的文献

1
Mnemonic brain state engagement is diminished in healthy aging.在健康衰老过程中,记忆性脑状态参与度会降低。
Neurobiol Aging. 2025 Jul;151:76-88. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2025.03.012. Epub 2025 Apr 12.
2
Age-related differences in information, but not task control in the color-word Stroop task.在颜色-文字斯特鲁普任务中,信息方面存在与年龄相关的差异,但任务控制方面不存在。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jan 17. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02631-z.
3
A new neuropsychological tool for simultaneous reading and executive functions assessment: initial psychometric properties.
一种用于同时评估阅读和执行功能的新型神经心理学工具:初始心理测量特性。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 23;15:1399388. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1399388. eCollection 2024.
4
Propositional density: cognitive impairment and aging.命题密度:认知障碍与衰老
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 29;15:1434506. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1434506. eCollection 2024.
5
Effect of tempo on the age-related changes in temporal expectation driven by rhythms.节奏对时间期望随年龄变化的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 8;19(2):e0297368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297368. eCollection 2024.
6
The Overview of Cognitive Aging Models.认知老化模型概述。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023;1419:47-60. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-1627-6_4.
7
Suicide capability within the ideation-to-action framework: A systematic scoping review.自杀意念到自杀行为框架内的自杀能力:系统范围界定综述。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276070. eCollection 2022.
8
Functional Field of View Determined by Crowding, Aging, or Glaucoma Under Divided Attention.分神时,拥挤、衰老或青光眼对功能视野的影响。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Dec 1;10(14):14. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.14.14.
9
The neural bases of multimodal sensory integration in older adults.老年人多模态感觉整合的神经基础。
Int J Behav Dev. 2021 Sep 1;45(5):409-417. doi: 10.1177/0165025420979362. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
10
Semantic knowledge attenuates age-related differences in event segmentation and episodic memory.语义知识减弱了事件分割和情景记忆的年龄相关差异。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Apr;50(3):586-600. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01220-y. Epub 2021 Sep 22.