• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文本体裁和语言能力对成年人在文本结构敏感性方面年龄差异的影响。

Effects of text genre and verbal ability on adult age differences in sensitivity to text structure.

作者信息

Petros T V, Norgaard L, Olson K, Tabor L

机构信息

University of North Dakota.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 1989 Jun;4(2):247-50. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.4.2.247.

DOI:10.1037//0882-7974.4.2.247
PMID:2789755
Abstract

The present study examined the effects of verbal ability and text genre on adult age differences in sensitivity to the semantic structure of prose. Young and older adults of low or high verbal ability heard narrative and expository passages at different presentation rates. The results demonstrated that older adults recalled less than younger adults and that age differences in recall were larger for low-verbal adults and expository texts. However, subjects from all groups favored the main ideas in their recalls for both types of passages. The results indicated that adult age similarities in the ability to focus on the main ideas when processing prose was not compromised by the verbal ability of the subjects or the organization of the passages used. However, the results also demonstrate how the characteristics of the learner and the characteristics of the text modulate the size of the age differences observed.

摘要

本研究考察了语言能力和文本体裁对成年人在散文语义结构敏感性方面年龄差异的影响。语言能力低或高的年轻和年长成年人以不同的呈现速度听取叙述性和说明性篇章。结果表明,年长成年人的回忆量少于年轻成年人,并且对于语言能力低的成年人和说明性文本,回忆中的年龄差异更大。然而,所有组的受试者在回忆这两种类型的篇章时都更倾向于主要观点。结果表明,在处理散文时关注主要观点的能力方面,成年人的年龄相似性不会受到受试者语言能力或所用篇章组织方式的影响。然而,结果也表明了学习者的特征和文本的特征是如何调节所观察到的年龄差异大小的。

相似文献

1
Effects of text genre and verbal ability on adult age differences in sensitivity to text structure.文本体裁和语言能力对成年人在文本结构敏感性方面年龄差异的影响。
Psychol Aging. 1989 Jun;4(2):247-50. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.4.2.247.
2
Age differences in processing expository and narrative text.处理说明文和记叙文文本时的年龄差异。
J Gerontol. 1989 Jan;44(1):P9-15. doi: 10.1093/geronj/44.1.p9.
3
Levels upon levels: predicting age differences in text recall.
Exp Aging Res. 1987 Winter;13(4):179-83. doi: 10.1080/03610738708259322.
4
Orienting tasks as moderators of narrative and expository text recall in adulthood.将定向任务作为成年人叙述性和说明性文本回忆的调节因素。
Psychol Aging. 1993 Mar;8(1):56-8. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.8.1.56.
5
Prose recall: effects of aging, verbal ability, and reading behavior.散文回忆:衰老、语言能力和阅读行为的影响。
J Gerontol. 1986 Jul;41(4):469-80. doi: 10.1093/geronj/41.4.469.
6
Reader and text variables as determinants of discourse memory in adulthood.读者和文本变量作为成年期语篇记忆的决定因素。
Psychol Aging. 1986 Jun;1(2):150-8. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.1.2.150.
7
Semantic memory and reading comprehension: the relationship through adulthood and aging.语义记忆和阅读理解:贯穿成年期和衰老期的关系。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Aug;33(8):2261-2271. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01771-1. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
8
Information recalled from prose by young, middle, and old adult readers.年轻、中年和老年成年读者从散文中回忆出的信息。
Exp Aging Res. 1981 Fall;7(3):253-68. doi: 10.1080/03610738108259809.
9
Written language comprehension in younger and older adults.年轻人和老年人的书面语言理解能力。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Jun;41(3):603-17. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4103.603.
10
Ability correlates of memory performance in adulthood and aging.成年期和老年期记忆表现的能力相关性。
Psychol Aging. 1990 Sep;5(3):356-68. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.5.3.356.

引用本文的文献

1
Can narrative help people engage with and understand information without being persuasive? An empirical study.叙事能否帮助人们在不具说服力的情况下参与并理解信息?一项实证研究。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jul 10;11(7):231708. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231708. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Effects of Written, Auditory, and Combined Modalities on Comprehension by People With Aphasia.书面、听觉和组合模态对失语症患者理解的影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Aug 9;28(3):1206-1221. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-0013. Epub 2019 Jun 27.