Suppr超能文献

三年未就诊的患者:健康检查邀请是否有益?

Patients not seen in three years: will invitations for health checks be of benefit?

作者信息

Noakes J

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Aug;41(349):335-8.

Abstract

An attempt has been made to evaluate the evidence for the likely benefit or otherwise, of the obligatory three-yearly checks as defined within the terms of service for doctors in general practice introduced to British general practitioners in April 1990. The content, interval, age groups, ethics, organizational cost, yield and outcome of the three-yearly checks are examined. No particular evidence is apparent which should deflect general practice from its present opportunistic approach to screening, and the already established national screening programmes.

摘要

有人试图评估1990年4月引入英国全科医生服务条款中规定的强制性三年一次检查可能带来的益处或其他影响。对三年一次检查的内容、间隔时间、年龄组、伦理、组织成本、收益和结果进行了研究。没有明显的特殊证据表明全科医疗应偏离目前的机会性筛查方法以及已确立的国家筛查项目。

相似文献

2
Health check-ups in general practice: a patient perspective.
Health Bull (Edinb). 1996 May;54(3):241-7.
3
Teenage screening in a general practice setting.
Health Visit. 1993 Oct;66(10):365-6.

本文引用的文献

3
Lead time in breast cancer detection and implications for periodicity of screening.
Am J Epidemiol. 1974 Nov;100(5):357-66. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112046.
4
Is unselective biochemical urine testing cost effective?非选择性生化尿液检测具有成本效益吗?
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Aug 3;291(6491):323-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6491.323.
7
Is routine urine testing in outpatient clinics useful?门诊常规尿液检查有用吗?
BMJ. 1988 Nov 5;297(6657):1173. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6657.1173.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验