Suppr超能文献

在美国常规护理环境中,初始抗高血压药物类别对患者持续性和依从性的影响。

Effects of initial antihypertensive drug class on patient persistence and compliance in a usual-care setting in the United States.

作者信息

Patel Bimal V, Remigio-Baker Rosemay A, Mehta Devi, Thiebaud Patrick, Frech-Tamas Feride, Preblick Ronald

机构信息

MedImpact Healthcare Systems, Inc, San Diego, CA 92131, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2007 Sep;9(9):692-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.07194.x.

Abstract

Antihypertensive treatment regimen persistence and compliance were measured using a retrospective cohort study of pharmacy claims data. Newly treated patients receiving monotherapy with angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), beta-blockers (BBs), or diuretics were followed for 1 year (N=242,882). A higher proportion of ARB patients (51.9%) were persistent in taking prescribed medication compared with those in the ACEI (48.0%), BB (40.3%), CCB (38.3%), and diuretic groups (29.9%). Compared with patients receiving diuretics, those receiving ARBs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.593; P<.0001), ACEIs (HR, 0.640; P<.0001), CCBs (HR, 0.859; P<.0001), and BBs (HR, 0.819; P<.0001) were all less likely to discontinue therapy. Compliance was similar in ACEI and ARB patients, but patients receiving ARBs and ACEIs had better compliance than those receiving BBs, CCBs, or diuretics. The lesser degree of compliance and persistence observed in patients receiving diuretics compared with other antihypertensive medications may have public health as well as cost implications.

摘要

使用药房报销数据的回顾性队列研究来衡量抗高血压治疗方案的持续性和依从性。对接受血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)、钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)、β受体阻滞剂(BB)或利尿剂单药治疗的新治疗患者进行了1年的随访(N = 242,882)。与接受ACEI(48.0%)、BB(40.3%)、CCB(38.3%)和利尿剂组(29.9%)的患者相比,ARB组患者持续服用处方药的比例更高(51.9%)。与接受利尿剂治疗的患者相比,接受ARB(风险比[HR],0.593;P <.0001)、ACEI(HR,0.640;P <.0001)、CCB(HR,0.859;P <.0001)和BB(HR,0.819;P <.0001)治疗的患者停药的可能性均较小。ACEI和ARB患者的依从性相似,但接受ARB和ACEI治疗的患者比接受BB、CCB或利尿剂治疗的患者依从性更好。与其他抗高血压药物相比,接受利尿剂治疗的患者依从性和持续性较低,这可能对公共卫生和成本产生影响。

相似文献

1
Effects of initial antihypertensive drug class on patient persistence and compliance in a usual-care setting in the United States.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2007 Sep;9(9):692-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.07194.x.
4
Current status of antihypertensive prescription and associated blood pressure control in Japan.
Hypertens Res. 2006 Mar;29(3):143-51. doi: 10.1291/hypres.29.143.
6
[Antihypertensive pharmacotherapy of patients in primary care with either a statutory or private health insurance].
Med Klin (Munich). 2009 Feb 15;104(2):108-13. doi: 10.1007/s00063-009-1028-4. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
7
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for Hypertension and Risk of Epilepsy.
JAMA Neurol. 2024 Aug 1;81(8):866-874. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1714.
10
Persistence with Antihypertensive Medications in Uncomplicated Treatment-Naïve Patients: Effects of Initial Therapeutic Classes.
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Dec;30(12):1800-6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.12.1800. Epub 2015 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

3
Persistence and compliance with newly initiated antihypertensive drug treatment in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Jun 21;10:1121-9. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S108757. eCollection 2016.
4
Achieving Adherence After First-Line Antihypertensive Treatment: Should Fixed-Dose Combinations Receive Priority?
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016 Sep;18(9):934-41. doi: 10.1111/jch.12799. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
5
Persistence with Antihypertensive Medications in Uncomplicated Treatment-Naïve Patients: Effects of Initial Therapeutic Classes.
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Dec;30(12):1800-6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.12.1800. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
6
Understanding Adherence and Prescription Patterns Using Large-Scale Claims Data.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Feb;34(2):169-79. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0333-4.
7
Antihypertensive medication persistence 1-year post-stroke hospitalization.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014 Dec;16(12):869-74. doi: 10.1111/jch.12424. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
10
Physician underutilization of effective medications for resistant hypertension at office visits in the United States: NAMCS 2006-2010.
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Mar;29(3):468-76. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2683-y. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension among United States adults 1999-2004.
Hypertension. 2007 Jan;49(1):69-75. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000252676.46043.18. Epub 2006 Dec 11.
4
Impact of medication adherence on hospitalization risk and healthcare cost.
Med Care. 2005 Jun;43(6):521-30. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000163641.86870.af.
5
First-line first? Trends in thiazide prescribing for hypertensive seniors.
PLoS Med. 2005 Apr;2(4):e80. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020080. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
6
The burden of adult hypertension in the United States 1999 to 2000: a rising tide.
Hypertension. 2004 Oct;44(4):398-404. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000142248.54761.56. Epub 2004 Aug 23.
7
Patient adherence with amlodipine, lisinopril, or valsartan therapy in a usual-care setting.
J Manag Care Pharm. 2003 Sep-Oct;9(5):424-9. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2003.9.5.424.
10
Risk adjustment using automated ambulatory pharmacy data: the RxRisk model.
Med Care. 2003 Jan;41(1):84-99. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200301000-00011.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验