Fromm Martin F, Schwilden Helmut, Bachmakov Iouri, König Jörg, Bremer Frank, Schüttler Jürgen
Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Dec;63(12):1129-33. doi: 10.1007/s00228-007-0365-6. Epub 2007 Sep 5.
Information is lacking on whether the CYP3A5 genotype affects the disposition and effects of midazolam during the long-term intensive care sedation of patients. This study was undertaken to estimate whether the CYP3A5 genotype can explain a relevant portion of pharmacokinetic interindividual variability.
We determined the CYP3A5 genotype in 71 Caucasian patients who underwent long-term sedation during intensive care treatment. We then assessed the relation between the genotype and both the plasma concentrations of midazolam and 1'-OH-midazolam in 645 plasma samples and the simultaneously estimated Ramsay sedation score, both of which were recorded during routine midazolam drug monitoring.
Eight patients had the CYP3A5*1/3 genotype and 63 patients the CYP3A53/*3 genotype. The concentration-dose ratio [C/D; plasma concentration of midazolam (ng/ml) divided by the rate of infusion (mg/h); expressed as the mean (95% confidence interval)] was 87.4 (70.8, 108.9) for the *3/*3 patients and 79.0 (48.9, 129.0) for *1/*3 patients. The corresponding data for infusion rate (IR; in mg/h), Ramsay score (RS) and the ratio 1'-OH-midazolam concentration/midazolam concentration (ROH) for *3/*3 and *1/*3 patients were IR 7.4 (6.2, 8.6) vs. 11.4 (4.9, 17.9), RS 5.4 (5.2, 5.6) vs. 5.3 (4.2, 6.0) and ROH 0.11 (0.09, 0.13) vs. 0.17 (0.11, 0.26), respectively.
The CYP3A5*1/*3 genotype did not lead to an apparently lower midazolam concentration/dose ratio or Ramsay score values. As the present sedation procedure during intensive care therapy may be described as a physician closed-loop titration towards Ramsay scores of 4 +/- 1, our data do not indicate that prior determination of the genotype will result in better care or economic savings.
关于细胞色素P450 3A5(CYP3A5)基因型是否会影响患者长期重症监护镇静期间咪达唑仑的处置和效应,目前尚缺乏相关信息。本研究旨在评估CYP3A5基因型能否解释药代动力学个体间变异性的相当一部分。
我们测定了71例在重症监护治疗期间接受长期镇静的白种患者的CYP3A5基因型。然后,我们在645份血浆样本中评估了基因型与咪达唑仑和1'-羟基咪达唑仑血浆浓度之间的关系,以及同时评估的Ramsay镇静评分,这两者均在常规咪达唑仑药物监测期间记录。
8例患者为CYP3A5*1/3基因型,63例患者为CYP3A53/*3基因型。*3/*3患者的浓度-剂量比[C/D;咪达唑仑血浆浓度(ng/ml)除以输注速率(mg/h);以均值(95%置信区间)表示]为87.4(70.8,108.9),*1/*3患者为79.0(48.9,129.0)。*3/3和1/*3患者的输注速率(IR;mg/h)、Ramsay评分(RS)以及1'-羟基咪达唑仑浓度/咪达唑仑浓度比值(ROH)的相应数据分别为:IR 7.4(6.2,8.6)对11.4(4.9,17.9),RS 5.4(5.2,5.6)对5.3(4.2,6.0),ROH 0.11(0.09,0.13)对0.17(0.11,0.26)。
CYP3A5*1/*3基因型并未导致明显更低的咪达唑仑浓度/剂量比或Ramsay评分值。由于目前重症监护治疗期间的镇静程序可描述为医生针对4±1的Ramsay评分进行闭环滴定,我们的数据并未表明预先测定基因型会带来更好的治疗效果或节省费用。