Suppr超能文献

危重症患者长期持续输注劳拉西泮和咪达唑仑诱导镇静的群体药效学建模

Population pharmacodynamic modelling of lorazepam- and midazolam-induced sedation upon long-term continuous infusion in critically ill patients.

作者信息

Swart Eleonora L, Zuideveld Klaas P, de Jongh Joost, Danhof Meindert, Thijs Lambertus G, Strack van Schijndel Robert M J

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Mar;62(3):185-94. doi: 10.1007/s00228-005-0085-8. Epub 2006 Jan 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present investigation was to develop a population pharmacodynamic model for midazolam- and lorazepam-induced sedation upon long-term continuous infusion in critically ill patients.

METHODS

The study was conducted in 59 patients receiving lorazepam and 54 patients receiving midazolam by continuous infusion for at least 24 h. Repeated blood samples were obtained for determination of the concentrations of lorazepam and midazolam. The level of sedation was assessed using a 5-point sedation scale.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of lorazepam and midazolam was described with previously proposed pharmacokinetic models. For the pharmacodynamics, the probability that the sedation was equal to or more than a specific score was described using a sigmoid E(max) model. The EC(50) values of lorazepam for the sedation scores equal or larger than 2-5 were 6.1, 57, 184 and 529 ng/ml, respectively. The corresponding values for midazolam were 216, 483, 1,100 and 2,200 ng/ml. Inter-individual variability in the EC(50) values was relatively high with a CV of 68% for lorazepam and 86% for midazolam (p=0.035). No covariates explaining part of the observed inter-individual variability were identified.

CONCLUSION

The population pharmacodynamic model shows a similarly wide intra- and inter-individual variability in the pharmacodynamics of both lorazepam and midazolam. Thus, the previously observed differences in "ease of titration" between lorazepam and midazolam are unrelated to pharmacodynamic factors.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是建立一个群体药效学模型,用于描述重症患者长期持续输注咪达唑仑和劳拉西泮时的镇静作用。

方法

本研究纳入了59例接受劳拉西泮持续输注至少24小时的患者和54例接受咪达唑仑持续输注至少24小时的患者。重复采集血样以测定劳拉西泮和咪达唑仑的浓度。使用5分制镇静量表评估镇静水平。

结果

劳拉西泮和咪达唑仑的药代动力学用先前提出的药代动力学模型进行描述。对于药效学,使用S型E(max)模型描述镇静程度等于或高于特定评分的概率。劳拉西泮对于镇静评分等于或大于2-5时的EC(50)值分别为6.1、57、184和529 ng/ml。咪达唑仑的相应值分别为216、483、1100和2200 ng/ml。EC(50)值的个体间变异性相对较高,劳拉西泮的CV为68%,咪达唑仑的CV为86%(p = 0.035)。未发现可解释部分观察到的个体间变异性的协变量。

结论

群体药效学模型显示,劳拉西泮和咪达唑仑的药效学在个体内和个体间均存在相似的广泛变异性。因此,先前观察到的劳拉西泮和咪达唑仑在“滴定易感性”方面的差异与药效学因素无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验