Somma J, Donner A, Zomorodi K, Sladen R, Ramsay J, Geller E, Shafer S L
Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University, California, USA.
Anesthesiology. 1998 Dec;89(6):1430-43. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199812000-00021.
Midazolam is used commonly for sedation in the surgical intensive care unit. A suboptimal dosing regimen may lead to relative overdosing, which could result in delayed extubation and increased cost. This multicenter trial characterized midazolam pharmacodynamics in patients recovering from coronary artery bypass grafting.
Three centers enrolled 90 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. All patients received sufentanil and midazolam via target-controlled infusion. After surgery, midazolam was titrated to a Ramsay sedation score of 5 for 2 h and then decreased to maintain a sedation score of 3 or 4 for at least another 4 h. Pharmacodynamic parameters were derived using NONMEM. The model was cross-validated to test performance.
The probability of a given level of sedation was related to the midazolam concentration by this equation: P(Sedation > or = ss) = Cn/(Cn + C(50,ss)n), where ss is the sedation score, C is the sum of the midazolam concentration and a term reflecting the dissipating effect of anesthesia: C = [midazolam] + theta x e(-Kt), where theta = 256 ng/ml and K = 0.19 h(-1). C(50,ss) values for Ramsay scores of 2 to 6 were 5.7, 71, 171, 260, and 659 ng/ml, respectively. The model predicted 57% of the data points correctly and 88% within one sedation score.
Despite previous reports of high interindividual variability in midazolam pharmacodynamics in patients in the surgical intensive care unit, these cross-validation results suggest that, when midazolam is administered using a target-controlled infusion device, the level of sedation can be predicted within 1 sedation score in 88% of patients based on the target midazolam concentration and the time since the conclusion of the anesthetic.
咪达唑仑常用于外科重症监护病房的镇静。给药方案欠佳可能导致相对过量用药,进而可能导致拔管延迟及费用增加。这项多中心试验对冠状动脉搭桥术后患者的咪达唑仑药效学进行了特征描述。
三个中心纳入了90例行冠状动脉搭桥术的患者。所有患者均通过靶控输注接受舒芬太尼和咪达唑仑。术后,将咪达唑仑滴定至Ramsay镇静评分5分并维持2小时,然后减量以至少再维持3或4分的镇静评分4小时。使用NONMEM得出药效学参数。对模型进行交叉验证以测试性能。
通过以下公式,特定镇静水平的概率与咪达唑仑浓度相关:P(镇静≥ss)=Cn/(Cn + C(50,ss)n),其中ss为镇静评分,C为咪达唑仑浓度与反映麻醉消散效应的一项之和:C = [咪达唑仑] + θ×e(-Kt),其中θ = 256 ng/ml且K = 0.19 h(-1)。Ramsay评分2至6分的C(50,ss)值分别为5.7、71、171、260和659 ng/ml。该模型正确预测了57%的数据点,在一个镇静评分范围内正确预测了88%的数据点。
尽管此前有报道称外科重症监护病房患者的咪达唑仑药效学存在高度个体间变异性,但这些交叉验证结果表明,当使用靶控输注装置给予咪达唑仑时,基于靶控咪达唑仑浓度和麻醉结束后的时间,88%的患者的镇静水平可在1个镇静评分范围内预测。