Timmann Dagmar, Daum Irene
Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Cerebellum. 2007;6(3):159-62. doi: 10.1080/14734220701496448.
Accumulating evidence from both human lesion and functional neuroimaging studies appears to support the hypothesis that the cerebellum contributes to non-motor functions. Along similar lines, cognitive, affective and behavioural changes in psychiatric disorders, such as autism, schizophrenia and dyslexia, have been linked to structural cerebellar abnormalities. The aim of this special issue was to evaluate the current knowledge base after more than 20 years of controversial discussion. The contributions of the special issue cover the most important cognitive domains, i.e., attention, memory and learning, executive control, language and visuospatial function. The available empirical evidence suggests that cognitive changes in patients with cerebellar dysfunction are mild and clearly less severe than the impairments observed after lesions to neocortical areas to which the cerebellum is closely connected via different cerebro-cerebellar loops. Frequently cited early findings, e.g., with respect to a specific cerebellar involvement in attention, have not been replicated or might be confounded by motor or working memory demands of the respective attention task. On the other hand, there is now convincing evidence for a cerebellar involvement in the mediation of a range of cognitive domains, most notably verbal working memory. Verbal working memory problems may partly underlie the compromised performance of cerebellar lesion patients on at least some complex cognitive tasks. Although investigations have moved from anecdotical case reports to hypothesis-driven controlled clinical group studies based on sound methods which are complemented by state-of-the-art functional neuroimaging studies, the empirical evidence available so far does not yet allow a convincing theory of the mechanisms of a cerebellar involvement in cognitive function. Future studies are clearly needed to further elucidate the nature of the processes linked to cerebellar mediation of cognitive processes and their possible link to motor theories of cerebellar function, e.g., its role in prediction and/or timing.
来自人类损伤研究和功能性神经影像学研究的越来越多的证据似乎支持这样一种假说,即小脑有助于非运动功能。同样,自闭症、精神分裂症和诵读困难等精神疾病中的认知、情感和行为变化与小脑结构异常有关。本特刊的目的是在经过20多年的争议性讨论后评估当前的知识基础。本特刊的论文涵盖了最重要的认知领域,即注意力、记忆与学习、执行控制、语言和视觉空间功能。现有的经验证据表明,小脑功能障碍患者的认知变化较为轻微,明显不如通过不同的脑-小脑环路与小脑紧密相连的新皮质区域损伤后观察到的损伤严重。经常被引用的早期研究结果,例如关于小脑在注意力方面的特定参与,并未得到重复验证,或者可能被相应注意力任务的运动或工作记忆需求所混淆。另一方面,现在有令人信服的证据表明小脑参与了一系列认知领域的调节,最显著的是言语工作记忆。言语工作记忆问题可能部分是小脑损伤患者在至少一些复杂认知任务上表现受损的基础。尽管研究已经从轶事性的病例报告转向基于可靠方法的假设驱动的对照临床组研究,并辅以最先进的功能性神经影像学研究,但迄今为止可用的经验证据还不足以形成一个关于小脑参与认知功能机制的令人信服的理论。显然需要未来的研究来进一步阐明与小脑对认知过程的调节相关的过程的性质,以及它们与小脑功能运动理论的可能联系,例如其在预测和/或计时中的作用。