Frank Benedikt, Schoch Beate, Richter Stefanie, Frings Markus, Karnath Hans-Otto, Timmann Dagmar
Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Cerebellum. 2007;6(3):242-53. doi: 10.1080/14734220701297432.
An increasing number of human lesion and functional brain imaging studies appear to support the hypothesis that the cerebellum contributes to a wide range of non-motor functions, including attention, language and visuospatial functions. Various abnormalities have been reported in standard neuropsychological tests in children and adolescents who have been treated for cerebellar tumors. This review focuses on limitations of lesion studies and negative findings in children and adolescents with focal cerebellar lesions. Frequently cited early findings have not been replicated in later studies or have been explained by motor components of the tasks. Such discrepancies may relate to a number of methodological problems. In addition to impaired motor function, it is unclear to what extent deficits in neuropsychological tests are caused by unspecific effects such as increased intracranial pressure and depression. Effects of extracerebellar lesions are frequently not considered. Although a role of the cerebellum in specific aspects of non-motor functions seems obvious it is still an open question which cognitive functions are involved, why and to what extent. It is a matter of ongoing discussion whether or not cognitive dysfunction belongs to the symptoms of cerebellar disease. Overall, disorders appear to be mild and far less frequent than disorders observed following lesions of cerebral areas. The aim of the review is to demonstrate that many findings frequently cited to support cerebellar involvement in cognition are insufficient to prove the hypothesis. There is ongoing need of well-controlled lesion studies, which show that disorders are due to cerebellar lesions independent of motor dysfunction and other confounding factors.
越来越多的人体损伤和脑功能成像研究似乎支持这样一种假说,即小脑参与多种非运动功能,包括注意力、语言和视觉空间功能。在接受过小脑肿瘤治疗的儿童和青少年的标准神经心理学测试中,已经报告了各种异常情况。这篇综述聚焦于儿童和青少年局灶性小脑损伤的损伤研究的局限性和阴性结果。早期经常被引用的研究结果在后来的研究中并未得到重复,或者已被任务的运动成分所解释。这种差异可能与一些方法学问题有关。除了运动功能受损外,神经心理学测试中的缺陷在多大程度上是由颅内压升高和抑郁等非特异性效应引起的尚不清楚。小脑外损伤的影响常常未被考虑。尽管小脑在非运动功能的特定方面所起的作用似乎很明显,但哪些认知功能参与其中、原因以及程度如何仍是一个悬而未决的问题。认知功能障碍是否属于小脑疾病的症状仍是一个正在讨论的问题。总体而言,这些障碍似乎较轻,且远比大脑区域损伤后观察到的障碍少见。这篇综述的目的是表明,许多经常被引用以支持小脑参与认知的研究结果不足以证明这一假说。持续需要进行严格控制的损伤研究,以表明这些障碍是由小脑损伤引起的,与运动功能障碍和其他混杂因素无关。