Science. 1984 Jan 20;223(4633):238. doi: 10.1126/science.223.4633.238-c.
In the report "Malaria parasites adopt host cell superoxide dismutase" by A. S. Fairchild et al. (19 Aug., p. 764), the caption for figure 2 on page 765 was incorrect and should read as follows: "Comparison of host and parasite SOD's (9) by (A) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (8) and (B) isoelecteric focusing (7). Gels were stained for SOD activity (10), and bovine erythrocyte SOD (Sigma, type 1) was used as a reference [pI = 4.95 (13)]. Lane 1, rat-derived P. berghei SOD; lane 2, rat erythrocyte SOD (pI = 5.1); lane 3, mouse-derived P. berghei SOD; lane 4, mouse erythrocyte SOD (pl = 5.7); lane 5, bovine erythrocyte SOD." The pI's of mouse and rat erythrocyte SOD's cited in the text should also be corrected to the values given above.
在A.S.费尔柴尔德等人于8月19日发表在第764页的报告《疟原虫采用宿主细胞超氧化物歧化酶》中，第765页图2的说明有误，应如下所示：“通过（A）聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳（8）和（B）等电聚焦（7）对宿主和寄生虫的超氧化物歧化酶（SOD）（9）进行比较。凝胶经超氧化物歧化酶活性染色（10），并使用牛红细胞超氧化物歧化酶（西格玛公司，1型）作为参照[pI = 4.95（13）]。泳道1，源自大鼠的伯氏疟原虫超氧化物歧化酶；泳道2，大鼠红细胞超氧化物歧化酶（pI = 5.1）；泳道3，源自小鼠的伯氏疟原虫超氧化物歧化酶；泳道4，小鼠红细胞超氧化物歧化酶（pI = 5.7）；泳道5，牛红细胞超氧化物歧化酶。”文中引用的小鼠和大鼠红细胞超氧化物歧化酶的pI值也应更正为上述给出的值。
