• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗专业人员和消费者对于让乳腺癌患者参与其疾病及治疗方案多学科讨论的看法。

Health professional and consumer views on involving breast cancer patients in the multidisciplinary discussion of their disease and treatment plan.

作者信息

Butow Phyllis, Harrison James D, Choy Ellis T, Young Jane M, Spillane Andrew, Evans Alison

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Cancer. 2007 Nov 1;110(9):1937-44. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23007.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.23007
PMID:17823912
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim was to obtain the views of health professionals and patients about the concept of involving breast cancer patients in the multidisciplinary (MD) treatment planning meeting.

METHODS

Breast cancer surgeons, nurses, oncologists, and patient advocates completed a mailed questionnaire.

RESULTS

The majority of breast cancer health professionals and patient advocates support shared decision-making (58%-62%). However, less than a third of surgeons (32%), medical (25%), and radiation oncologists (24%) were supportive of involving women in the MD treatment planning meeting. In contrast, 93% of breast cancer advocates and 73% of breast cancer nurses were supportive of this approach. Patient advocates were significantly more in favor than all other groups (chi(2) = 148.8, df = 4, P < .001). The common reasons for supporting patient involvement included that it would lead to patients being more informed and empowered, provide them with an opportunity to ask questions, facilitate decision-making, and improve communication between the patient and the medical team. Health professionals stated that attendance would make patients anxious and that they would have to modify their medical language. Suggestions about how to manage patient involvement included the patient being supported by a breast nurse and pre-education before the meeting. Patient advocates were significantly more willing to participate in a randomized controlled trial of this process compared with all other groups. (chi(2) = 155.15, df = 4, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite health professional's reservations, patient advocates were highly supportive of including women in the MD meeting. Such a high demand justifies consideration of this option.

摘要

背景

目的是了解医疗专业人员和患者对于让乳腺癌患者参与多学科治疗计划会议这一概念的看法。

方法

乳腺癌外科医生、护士、肿瘤学家和患者权益倡导者完成了一份邮寄问卷。

结果

大多数乳腺癌医疗专业人员和患者权益倡导者支持共同决策(58%-62%)。然而,不到三分之一的外科医生(32%)、内科医生(25%)和放射肿瘤学家(24%)支持让女性参与多学科治疗计划会议。相比之下,93%的乳腺癌权益倡导者和73%的乳腺癌护士支持这种方法。患者权益倡导者比所有其他群体明显更赞成(卡方检验=148.8,自由度=4,P<.001)。支持患者参与的常见原因包括这会使患者了解更多信息并增强能力,为他们提供提问机会,促进决策制定,并改善患者与医疗团队之间的沟通。医疗专业人员表示患者出席会使其焦虑,而且他们将不得不调整医学用语。关于如何管理患者参与的建议包括让患者得到乳腺科护士的支持以及在会议前进行预先教育。与所有其他群体相比,患者权益倡导者明显更愿意参与这一过程的随机对照试验(卡方检验=155.15,自由度=4,P<.001)。

结论

尽管医疗专业人员有所保留,但患者权益倡导者高度支持让女性参与多学科会议。如此高的需求证明有必要考虑这一选择。

相似文献

1
Health professional and consumer views on involving breast cancer patients in the multidisciplinary discussion of their disease and treatment plan.医疗专业人员和消费者对于让乳腺癌患者参与其疾病及治疗方案多学科讨论的看法。
Cancer. 2007 Nov 1;110(9):1937-44. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23007.
2
A pilot study to evaluate the impact of involving breast cancer patients in the multidisciplinary discussion of their disease and treatment plan.一项评估让乳腺癌患者参与其疾病及治疗方案多学科讨论的影响的试点研究。
Breast. 2007 Apr;16(2):178-89. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2006.10.002. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
3
Cancer communication patterns and the influence of patient characteristics: disparities in information-giving and affective behaviors.癌症沟通模式及患者特征的影响:信息提供与情感行为方面的差异
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Sep;62(3):355-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.011. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
4
Supportive care provided by physicians and nurses to women with breast cancer. Results from a population-based survey.医生和护士为乳腺癌女性提供的支持性护理。一项基于人群的调查结果。
Support Care Cancer. 2002 Nov;10(8):647-52. doi: 10.1007/s00520-002-0370-3. Epub 2002 Jul 20.
5
Nurse views of the adequacy of decision making and nurse distress regarding artificial hydration for terminally ill cancer patients: a nationwide survey.护士对晚期癌症患者人工补液决策充分性的看法及护士的困扰:一项全国性调查。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2007;24(6):463-9. doi: 10.1177/1049909107302301. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
6
Understanding the impact of breast reconstruction on the surgical decision-making process for breast cancer.了解乳房重建对乳腺癌手术决策过程的影响。
Cancer. 2008 Feb 1;112(3):489-94. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23214.
7
Treatment decision-making among older women with breast cancer.老年乳腺癌女性的治疗决策制定
J Women Aging. 2006;18(4):31-47. doi: 10.1300/J074v18n04_04.
8
Women's perceptions of their treatment decision-making about breast cancer treatment.女性对其乳腺癌治疗决策的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Dec;73(3):431-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.015. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
9
Physician-identified factors affecting patient participation in reaching treatment decisions.医生确定的影响患者参与治疗决策的因素。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1724-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.5566.
10
Nurse-patient interaction and decision-making in care: patient involvement in community nursing.护理中的护患互动与决策:患者参与社区护理
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Jul;55(2):142-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03904.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of multidisciplinary team decisions on the management of complex bone and joint infections: an observational study.多学科团队关于复杂骨与关节感染管理决策的实施:一项观察性研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jan 18;26(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08329-0.
2
Integrated Electronic Health Record of Multidisciplinary Professionals Throughout the Cancer Care Pathway: A Pilot Study Exploring Patient-Centered Information in Breast Cancer Patients.贯穿癌症护理路径的多学科专业人员综合电子健康记录:一项探索乳腺癌患者以患者为中心信息的试点研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 May 7;17:2069-2081. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S455281. eCollection 2024.
3
Characterizing Different Multidisciplinary Team Models Implemented Within One Comprehensive Cancer Center.
对一个综合癌症中心实施的不同多学科团队模式进行特征描述。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Jun 29;16:1845-1855. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S402348. eCollection 2023.
4
Show me the roads and give me a road map: Development of a patient conversation tool to improve lung cancer treatment decision-making.向我展示道路并给我一张路线图:开发一种患者沟通工具以改善肺癌治疗决策。
PEC Innov. 2022 Oct 21;1:100094. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100094. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Shared-Decision-Making Experiences in Breast Cancer Care with and without Patient Participation in Multidisciplinary Tumor Conferences: A Mixed-Methods-Study.乳腺癌护理中有无患者参与多学科肿瘤会议的共同决策体验:一项混合方法研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Feb 11;16:397-409. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S397300. eCollection 2023.
6
How shared is decision-making in multidisciplinary tumour conferences with patient participation? An observational study.多学科肿瘤会议中是否有患者参与的决策共享?一项观察性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):3297-3306. doi: 10.1111/hex.13638. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
7
How do patients make decisions in the context of a multidisciplinary team: an ethnographic study of four head and neck cancer centres in the north of England.患者在多学科团队环境下如何做出决策:对英格兰北部四个头颈部癌症中心的民族志研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 24;12(8):e061654. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061654.
8
Factors influencing the quality and functioning of oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: results of a systematic review.影响肿瘤多学科团队会议质量和功能的因素:系统评价的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08112-0.
9
Quality and efficacy of Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) quality assessment tools and discussion checklists: a systematic review.多学科团队(MDT)质量评估工具和讨论清单的质量和效果:系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 17;22(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09369-8.
10
Setup of multidisciplinary team discussions for patients with cholangiocarcinoma: current practice and recommendations from the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA).建立多学科团队讨论治疗胆管细胞癌患者的方案:欧洲胆管细胞癌研究网络(ENS-CCA)的现行实践与建议。
ESMO Open. 2022 Feb;7(1):100377. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100377. Epub 2022 Jan 27.