• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌护理中有无患者参与多学科肿瘤会议的共同决策体验:一项混合方法研究。

Shared-Decision-Making Experiences in Breast Cancer Care with and without Patient Participation in Multidisciplinary Tumor Conferences: A Mixed-Methods-Study.

作者信息

Heuser Christian, Schellenberger Barbara, Ernstmann Nicole, Diekmann Annika, Krüger Emily, Schreiber Leonie, Scholl Isabelle, Ansmann Lena

机构信息

Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research (CHSR), Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Bonn), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, 53127, Germany.

Chair for Health Services Research, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, 50933, Germany.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Feb 11;16:397-409. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S397300. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S397300
PMID:36816614
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9930677/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed (1) to analyze patients' perceived shared decision-making (SDM) experiences over 4 weeks between patients participating or not in multidisciplinary tumor conferences (MTCs) and (2) to analyze the association of patients' active participation in and organizational variables of MTCs with patients' perceived SDM experience directly after MTC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From the N=317 patients, this observational study included patient surveys, observations, and audio transcripts from MTCs with (N=82) and without (N=145) patient participation in six breast and gynecologic cancer centers. We performed t tests for within- and between-group comparisons and linear regression with "patients' perceived SDM experiences in MTC" as the dependent variable.

RESULTS

Patients' perceived SDM experiences increased at 4 weeks after MTC (p<0.001) with lower perceived SDM experiences for participating versus nonparticipating patients (p<0.001). Linear regression showed that the organizational variable "round table seating arrangement" was significantly associated with higher perceived SDM experiences compared with a theater or U-shape arrangement (beta=-0.38, p=0.043; beta=-0.69, p=0.010) directly after MTC.

CONCLUSION

Results provide first insights into patients' perceived SDM experiences in MTCs. SDM in MTCs is associated with organizational variables of MTCs. A round table seating arrangement in MTCs with patient participation seems important for patients' perceived SDM experiences. The relatively low perceived SDM experiences of participating patients directly after MTC indicates room for improvement, eg concerning patient-centered communication.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在(1)分析参与或未参与多学科肿瘤会议(MTC)的患者在4周内感知到的共同决策(SDM)体验,以及(2)分析患者在MTC中的积极参与和组织变量与MTC结束后患者感知到的SDM体验之间的关联。

患者与方法

在6个乳腺癌和妇科癌症中心,对N = 317名患者进行了这项观察性研究,包括患者调查、观察以及有患者参与(N = 82)和无患者参与(N = 145)的MTC音频记录。我们进行了组内和组间比较的t检验,并以“患者在MTC中感知到的SDM体验”为因变量进行线性回归分析。

结果

MTC后4周,患者感知到的SDM体验有所增加(p < 0.001),参与会议的患者与未参与会议的患者相比,感知到的SDM体验较低(p < 0.001)。线性回归分析表明,与剧院式或U形座位安排相比,组织变量“圆桌座位安排”与MTC结束后更高的感知SDM体验显著相关(β = -0.38,p = 0.043;β = -0.69,p = 0.010)。

结论

研究结果首次揭示了患者在MTC中感知到的SDM体验。MTC中的SDM与MTC的组织变量相关。对于患者感知到的SDM体验而言,患者参与的MTC中的圆桌座位安排似乎很重要。参与会议的患者在MTC结束后立即感知到的SDM体验相对较低,这表明仍有改进空间,例如在以患者为中心的沟通方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb93/9930677/d5b2b4930f6e/JMDH-16-397-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb93/9930677/1110f4b59eb6/JMDH-16-397-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb93/9930677/d5b2b4930f6e/JMDH-16-397-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb93/9930677/1110f4b59eb6/JMDH-16-397-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb93/9930677/d5b2b4930f6e/JMDH-16-397-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Shared-Decision-Making Experiences in Breast Cancer Care with and without Patient Participation in Multidisciplinary Tumor Conferences: A Mixed-Methods-Study.乳腺癌护理中有无患者参与多学科肿瘤会议的共同决策体验:一项混合方法研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Feb 11;16:397-409. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S397300. eCollection 2023.
2
Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences: How is it implemented? What is the patients' role? What are patients' experiences?患者参与多学科肿瘤会议:如何实施?患者的角色是什么?患者的体验是什么?
Cancer Med. 2021 Oct;10(19):6714-6724. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4213. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
3
How shared is decision-making in multidisciplinary tumour conferences with patient participation? An observational study.多学科肿瘤会议中是否有患者参与的决策共享?一项观察性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):3297-3306. doi: 10.1111/hex.13638. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
4
Is patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences associated with their fear of progression?患者参与多学科肿瘤会议是否与其对疾病进展的恐惧有关?
Psychooncology. 2021 Sep;30(9):1572-1581. doi: 10.1002/pon.5733. Epub 2021 May 24.
5
Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumour conferences in breast cancer care (PINTU): a mixed-methods study protocol.患者参与乳腺癌多学科肿瘤会议(PINTU):一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 8;9(4):e024621. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024621.
6
Health literacy and patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences in breast cancer care: a multilevel modeling approach.健康素养与乳腺癌多学科肿瘤会议中的患者参与:多层次建模方法。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Apr 8;19(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5546-z.
7
Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences: Providers' perceptions of patients' need satisfaction and emotional experiences.患者参与多学科肿瘤会议:提供者对患者需求满足和情感体验的看法。
Psychooncology. 2020 Aug;29(8):1263-1271. doi: 10.1002/pon.5413. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
8
Is There a Relationship between Shared Decision Making and Breast Cancer Patients' Trust in Their Medical Oncologists?共享决策与乳腺癌患者对肿瘤医生信任之间是否存在关系?
Med Decis Making. 2020 Jan;40(1):52-61. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19889905. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
9
Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences in breast and gynecological cancer care: How patient-centered is the communication?患者参与乳腺癌和妇科癌症护理的多学科肿瘤会议:沟通的以患者为中心程度如何?
Psychooncology. 2022 Sep;31(9):1597-1606. doi: 10.1002/pon.5999. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
10
How do breast cancer patients experience multidisciplinary tumor conferences? - A description from the patient perspective.乳腺癌患者如何体验多学科肿瘤会议?- 从患者角度的描述。
Breast. 2019 Apr;44:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.12.012. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared decision-making for early-stage breast cancer treatment: An evolutionary concept analysis.早期乳腺癌治疗的共同决策:一项概念演变分析
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2025 Aug 19;12:100775. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100775. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Clinicians perspectives towards the application of shared decision making in tertiary CVD care including the multidisciplinary heart team.临床医生对包括多学科心脏团队在内的三级心血管疾病护理中应用共同决策的看法。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 Mar 26;58:101657. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101657. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
How shared is decision-making in multidisciplinary tumour conferences with patient participation? An observational study.多学科肿瘤会议中是否有患者参与的决策共享?一项观察性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):3297-3306. doi: 10.1111/hex.13638. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
2
Mapping Current Organizational Structure and Improvement Points of Breast Cancer Multidisciplinary Team Meetings - An Interview Study.绘制乳腺癌多学科团队会议的当前组织结构及改进要点——一项访谈研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Oct 21;15:2421-2430. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S380293. eCollection 2022.
3
From "Cure" to "Care": The Role of the MultiDisciplinary Team on Colorectal Cancer Patients' Satisfaction and Oncological Outcomes.
从“治愈”到“关怀”:多学科团队在结直肠癌患者满意度及肿瘤治疗结果中的作用
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Jun 27;15:1415-1426. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S362550. eCollection 2022.
4
Questions and emotional expressions from patients and companions while participating in multidisciplinary tumor conferences in breast and gynecological cancer centers.患者及其陪伴者在乳腺和妇科癌症中心参加多学科肿瘤会议期间提出的问题及情感表达。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2058-2066. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.12.010. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
5
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
6
Contributions to Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Cancer Care: Predictors of Complete Case Information and Comprehensive Case Discussions.对癌症护理多学科团队会议的贡献:完整病例信息和全面病例讨论的预测因素。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Sep 4;14:2445-2452. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S309162. eCollection 2021.
7
Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences: How is it implemented? What is the patients' role? What are patients' experiences?患者参与多学科肿瘤会议:如何实施?患者的角色是什么?患者的体验是什么?
Cancer Med. 2021 Oct;10(19):6714-6724. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4213. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
8
The Next Step Toward Patient-Centeredness in Multidisciplinary Cancer Team Meetings: An Interview Study with Professionals.多学科癌症团队会议中以患者为中心的下一步:一项针对专业人员的访谈研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Jun 4;14:1311-1324. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S286044. eCollection 2021.
9
Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards in Breast Cancer Care - An Observational Study.乳腺癌护理中多学科肿瘤委员会的决策制定——一项观察性研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Jun 1;14:1275-1284. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S300061. eCollection 2021.
10
Making Tumor Boards More Patient-Centered: Let's Start With the Name.让肿瘤病例讨论会更以患者为中心:让我们从名称开始。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Oct;17(10):591-593. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00588. Epub 2021 Mar 18.