• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在未经治疗的、Gleason评分4-7分的临床局限性前列腺癌中,随访活检的Gleason分级与初次活检的Gleason分级有多大差异?

How much does Gleason grade of follow-up biopsy differ from that of initial biopsy in untreated, Gleason score 4-7, clinically localized prostate cancer?

作者信息

Choo R, Danjoux C, Morton G, Szumacher E, Sugar L, Gardner S, Kim M, Choo C M, Klotz L

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Prostate. 2007 Nov 1;67(15):1614-20. doi: 10.1002/pros.20648.

DOI:10.1002/pros.20648
PMID:17823923
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare histologic grades between an initial biopsy and a follow-up biopsy in untreated, Gleason score (GS) 4-7, clinically localized prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In a prospective single-arm cohort study, clinically localized, GS 4-7, prostate cancer was managed with active surveillance alone, provided that a pre-defined definition of disease progression was not met. One hundred five (63%) of a total of 168 eligible patients underwent a follow-up prostate biopsy during surveillance. Median time to a follow-up biopsy was 22 months (range: 7-81). Histologic grades between these two biopsies were compared to evaluate the extent of histologic grade change.

RESULTS

On the follow-up biopsy, GS was unchanged in 33 patients (31%), upgraded in 37 (35%), and downgraded in 34 (32%). Eleven (10%) had upgrading by 2 Gleason points or more. Eight (8%) had upgrading to GS 8 (none to GS 9 or 10); of these, six were among those with upgrading by 2 Gleason points or more. Twenty-seven (26%) had no malignancy on the follow-up biopsy. Negative follow-up biopsy was more prevalent in patients with a small volume of malignancy in the initial biopsy and a low baseline PSA.

CONCLUSIONS

No consistent change in histologic grade was observed on the follow-up biopsy at a median of 22 months in untreated, GS 4-7, clinically localized prostate cancer. Upgrading to GS > or =8 or by 2 Gleason points or more was relatively uncommon.

摘要

目的

比较未经治疗的 Gleason 评分(GS)4 - 7 分的临床局限性前列腺癌患者初次活检与随访活检的组织学分级。

方法与材料

在一项前瞻性单臂队列研究中,对于临床局限性、GS 4 - 7 分的前列腺癌患者,若未达到疾病进展的预定义标准,则仅进行主动监测。168 例符合条件的患者中有 105 例(63%)在监测期间接受了随访前列腺活检。随访活检的中位时间为 22 个月(范围:7 - 81 个月)。比较这两次活检的组织学分级,以评估组织学分级变化的程度。

结果

在随访活检中,33 例患者(31%)的 GS 未改变,37 例(35%)升级,34 例(32%)降级。11 例(10%)Gleason 评分升高 2 分或更多。8 例(8%)升级至 GS 8(无升级至 GS 9 或 10 的患者);其中,6 例属于 Gleason 评分升高 2 分或更多的患者。27 例(26%)在随访活检中未发现恶性肿瘤。随访活检结果为阴性在初次活检时恶性肿瘤体积较小且基线 PSA 较低的患者中更为常见。

结论

在未经治疗的 GS 4 - 7 分的临床局限性前列腺癌患者中,随访活检(中位时间 22 个月)时未观察到组织学分级的一致变化。升级至 GS≥8 或 Gleason 评分升高 2 分或更多相对不常见。

相似文献

1
How much does Gleason grade of follow-up biopsy differ from that of initial biopsy in untreated, Gleason score 4-7, clinically localized prostate cancer?在未经治疗的、Gleason评分4-7分的临床局限性前列腺癌中,随访活检的Gleason分级与初次活检的Gleason分级有多大差异?
Prostate. 2007 Nov 1;67(15):1614-20. doi: 10.1002/pros.20648.
2
Comparison of histologic grade between initial and follow-up biopsy in untreated, low to intermediate grade, localized prostate cancer.未经治疗的低至中级、局限性前列腺癌患者初始活检与随访活检组织学分级的比较。
Can J Urol. 2004 Feb;11(1):2118-24.
3
Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.扩展前列腺活检方案提高了 Gleason 分级的可靠性:对放疗患者的影响
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jun 1;59(2):386-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.014.
4
Active surveillance; a reasonable management alternative for patients with prostate cancer: the Miami experience.主动监测:前列腺癌患者合理的治疗选择:迈阿密经验
BJU Int. 2008 Jan;101(2):165-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07190.x. Epub 2007 Sep 10.
5
Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens over the past 10 years: is there evidence for systematic upgrading?过去10年前列腺穿刺活检和根治性前列腺切除术标本的Gleason评分:是否有系统性升级的证据?
Cancer. 2002 Apr 15;94(8):2282-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10457.
6
Active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort.当代队列中前列腺癌管理的主动监测
Cancer. 2008 Jun 15;112(12):2664-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23502.
7
Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer.预测中、高级别前列腺癌患者显著分级变化的前列腺活检临床和病理变量。
BJU Int. 2009 Jan;103(1):43-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08059.x. Epub 2008 Sep 8.
8
Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.活检组织条数量是低风险前列腺癌患者临床显著 Gleason 评分升级的最重要预测因素之一。
Urology. 2009 May;73(5):1087-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.048. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
9
Prostate cancer grading: the effect of stratification of needle biopsy Gleason Score 4 + 3 as high or intermediate grade.前列腺癌分级:对前列腺穿刺活检 Gleason 评分 4+3 进行分层为高级别或中级别分组的影响。
BJU Int. 2010 Mar;105(5):631-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08810.x. Epub 2009 Sep 3.
10
Predicting the risk of patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 to harbor a higher grade cancer.预测活检Gleason评分为6分的患者患有更高分级癌症的风险。
J Urol. 2007 Nov;178(5):1925-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.049. Epub 2007 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Reclassification of prostate cancer on first confirmatory prostate biopsy in men under active surveillance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.接受主动监测的男性首次确诊前列腺活检时前列腺癌的重新分类:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cent European J Urol. 2025;78(2):125-136. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2025.0011. Epub 2025 May 26.
2
[Active surveillance of prostate cancer].[前列腺癌的主动监测]
Urologie. 2025 Mar 20. doi: 10.1007/s00120-025-02555-z.
3
[Active surveillance in prostate cancer].[前列腺癌的主动监测]
Urologe A. 2019 May;58(5):511-517. doi: 10.1007/s00120-019-0921-6.
4
Baseline and longitudinal plasma caveolin-1 level as a biomarker in active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer.基线和纵向血浆小窝蛋白-1水平作为早期前列腺癌主动监测中的生物标志物。
BJU Int. 2018 Jan;121(1):69-76. doi: 10.1111/bju.13963. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
5
A tale of two trials: The impact of 5α-reductase inhibition on prostate cancer (Review).两项试验的故事:5α-还原酶抑制对前列腺癌的影响(综述)
Oncol Lett. 2014 Oct;8(4):1391-1396. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2388. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
6
Gleason grade progression is uncommon.格里森分级进展不常见。
Cancer Res. 2013 Aug 15;73(16):5163-8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0427.
7
Prostate cancer specific survival in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.前列腺癌在前列腺癌、肺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌(PLCO)筛查试验中的特异性生存。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;36(6):e401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
8
Active surveillance for prostate cancer: past, present and future.前列腺癌的主动监测:过去、现在和未来。
Curr Opin Oncol. 2012 May;24(3):243-50. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e3283527f99.
9
Prostate cancer: A closer look at the initial results from the REDUCE trial.前列腺癌:深入了解REDUCE试验的初步结果。
Nat Rev Urol. 2010 Oct;7(10):535-7. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.144.
10
Prostate cancer managed with active surveillance: role of anatomic MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging.主动监测管理的前列腺癌:解剖磁共振成像和磁共振波谱成像的作用。
Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):176-83. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091147. Epub 2010 May 26.