Matvienko Oksana
School of Health, Physical Education, and Leisure Services, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa 50614-0241, USA.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007 Sep-Oct;39(5):281-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2007.01.004.
To report the impact of nutrition education on snack choices of children ages 6 and 7 years.
In this quasi-experimental study, students at 2 intervention schools participated in a 4-week after-school program, NutriActive Healthy Experience, that included nutrition lessons, healthy snacks, and parent education. Students at 2 comparison schools did not receive any intervention but participated in the assessment of snack choices. Intervention and comparison students were offered the choice of 3 out of 10 snack items at baseline, at the end of the 4-week program, and 4 months later.
An after-school program in the school setting.
36 intervention and 23 comparison kindergarten and first-grade students.
Students' snack choices were coded and analyzed.
t test, repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Immediately after the program, the intervention group showed a 25.7% improvement in choosing more healthful snacks, and the comparison group showed an 18.2% decline. At 4 months, the intervention group's score was 33.3% higher than baseline and the comparison group's score remained 18.2% lower than baseline (time by treatment interaction, P= .023).
Intervention students were significantly more likely than comparison students to choose more healthful snacks when given the opportunity. The snack test may be a useful alternative for assessing snack choices of children ages six to seven years.
报告营养教育对6至7岁儿童零食选择的影响。
在这项准实验研究中,2所干预学校的学生参加了一个为期4周的课外项目“NutriActive健康体验”,该项目包括营养课程、健康零食和家长教育。2所对照学校的学生未接受任何干预,但参与了零食选择评估。在基线、4周项目结束时以及4个月后,干预组和对照组的学生可从10种零食中选择3种。
学校环境中的课外项目。
36名干预组和23名对照组的幼儿园及一年级学生。
对学生的零食选择进行编码和分析。
t检验、重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)。
项目刚结束后,干预组选择更健康零食的比例提高了25.7%,而对照组下降了18.2%。4个月时,干预组的得分比基线高33.3%,而对照组的得分仍比基线低18.2%(时间与处理的交互作用,P = .023)。
有机会时,干预组学生比对照组学生更有可能选择更健康的零食。零食测试可能是评估6至7岁儿童零食选择的一种有用方法。