• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术阴道分娩失败的预测因素:单中心经验

Predictors of failed operative vaginal delivery: a single-center experience.

作者信息

Ben-Haroush Avi, Melamed Nir, Kaplan Boris, Yogev Yariv

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;197(3):308.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.051.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.051
PMID:17826432
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify factors that predict operative vaginal delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study was conducted that included all women who underwent a trial of operative vaginal delivery between 1993 and 2006 at a major tertiary center.

RESULTS

Operative vaginal delivery was attempted in 5120 of 83,351 deliveries (6.1%): 4299 vacuum extractions (84.0%) and 821 forceps deliveries (16.0%). Failures occurred in 8.6% of trials, more often with vacuum extraction (10.0% vs 1.3%; P < .001). Most vacuum extraction failures (72.6%) were followed by a trial of forceps delivery, which failed in 3.5% of cases. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the use of forceps (vs vacuum; odds ratio [OR], 0.4; 95%CI, 0.2-0.7) and administration of analgesia (epidural: OR, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.2-0.7]; intravenous opiates: OR, 0.2 [95%CI, 0.1-0.6]) were associated with a lower risk of failure, persistent occiput posterior position (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-3.5) and birthweight >4000 g (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.6-4.9), with a higher risk.

CONCLUSION

Fetal weight and head position should be evaluated carefully before operative vaginal delivery, and the use of analgesia should be encouraged.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定预测手术阴道分娩的因素。

研究设计

进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了1993年至2006年期间在一家大型三级医疗中心接受手术阴道分娩试验的所有女性。

结果

在83351例分娩中有5120例尝试进行手术阴道分娩(6.1%):4299例真空吸引术(84.0%)和821例产钳助产(16.0%)。8.6%的试验失败,真空吸引术失败的情况更常见(10.0%对1.3%;P <.001)。大多数真空吸引术失败(72.6%)后进行了产钳助产试验,其中3.5%的病例失败。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,使用产钳(与真空吸引术相比;比值比[OR],0.4;95%置信区间[CI],0.2 - 0.7)和使用镇痛剂(硬膜外麻醉:OR,0.4[95%CI,0.2 - 0.7];静脉注射阿片类药物:OR,0.2[95%CI,0.1 - 0.6])与较低的失败风险相关,持续性枕后位(OR,2.2;95%CI,1.4 - 3.5)和出生体重>4000 g(OR,2.8;95%CI,1.6 - 4.9)与较高的失败风险相关。

结论

在进行手术阴道分娩前应仔细评估胎儿体重和胎位,并鼓励使用镇痛剂。

相似文献

1
Predictors of failed operative vaginal delivery: a single-center experience.手术阴道分娩失败的预测因素:单中心经验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;197(3):308.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.051.
2
The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries.枕后位胎儿头部位置对产钳辅助阴道分娩时肛门括约肌损伤风险的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;192(5):1702-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.047.
3
Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.器械助产:法国妇产科学院临床实践指南。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Nov;159(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.06.043. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
4
Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery.会阴侧切术可降低阴道助产分娩时肛门括约肌损伤的风险。
BJOG. 2008 Jan;115(1):104-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01554.x. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
5
A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.一项关于手术阴道分娩时会阴切开术的使用与母婴发病率关系的前瞻性队列研究。
BJOG. 2008 Dec;115(13):1688-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01961.x.
6
[Instrumental extractions using Thierry's spatulas: evaluation of the risk of perineal laceration according to occiput position in operative deliveries].[使用蒂埃里刮匙进行器械助产:根据手术分娩时枕部位置评估会阴撕裂风险]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008 May;37(3):276-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.10.006. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
7
Associated factors and outcomes of persistent occiput posterior position: A retrospective cohort study from 1976 to 2001.持续性枕后位的相关因素及结局:一项1976年至2001年的回顾性队列研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006 Sep;19(9):563-8. doi: 10.1080/14767050600682487.
8
The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes.序贯使用真空吸引器和产钳进行阴道助产对新生儿及产妇结局的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;185(4):896-902. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117309.
9
Operative vaginal delivery: a comparison of forceps and vacuum for success rate and risk of rectal sphincter injury.手术阴道分娩:产钳与真空吸引器在成功率及直肠括约肌损伤风险方面的比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Sep;191(3):907-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.075.
10
Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.产钳和真空辅助分娩对产妇和新生儿的即时影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;103(3):513-8. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000114985.22844.6d.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence, Intrapartum Ultrasound and Dystocic Delivery: AIDA (Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm), a Promising Helping Decision Support System.人工智能、产时超声与难产分娩:AIDA(人工智能难产算法),一种有前景的辅助决策支持系统。
J Imaging. 2024 Apr 29;10(5):107. doi: 10.3390/jimaging10050107.
2
Clinical and Physician Factors Associated With Failed Operative Vaginal Delivery.与手术失败的阴道分娩相关的临床和医生因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jun 1;141(6):1181-1189. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005181. Epub 2023 May 3.
3
Prospective assessment of vacuum deliveries from midpelvic station in a tertiary care university hospital: Frequency, failure rates, labor characteristics and maternal and neonatal complications.
在一家三级护理大学医院的中骨盆部位行真空分娩的前瞻性评估:频率、失败率、分娩特征以及母婴并发症。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 16;16(11):e0259926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259926. eCollection 2021.
4
Naegele Forceps Delivery and Association between Morbidity and the Number of Forceps Traction Applications: A Retrospective Study.内格莱产钳助产与发病率及产钳牵引应用次数之间的关联:一项回顾性研究
J Pregnancy. 2015;2015:483195. doi: 10.1155/2015/483195. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
5
Determinants and Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Section following Failed Instrumental Delivery: 5-Year Observational Review at a Tertiary Referral Centre in London.器械助产失败后急诊剖宫产的决定因素及结局:伦敦一家三级转诊中心的5年观察性回顾
J Pregnancy. 2015;2015:627810. doi: 10.1155/2015/627810. Epub 2015 May 11.
6
A prospective cohort study of the morbidity associated with operative vaginal deliveries performed by day and at night.一项关于日间和夜间进行阴道助产分娩相关发病率的前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 29;4(10):e006291. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006291.
7
Factors influencing the likelihood of instrumental delivery success.影响器械分娩成功率的因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;123(4):796-803. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000188.
8
Study protocol. IDUS - Instrumental delivery & ultrasound: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery.研究方案。IDUS-器械分娩与超声:一项多中心随机对照试验,比较超声评估胎儿头部位置与标准护理作为预防器械分娩并发症的方法。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Sep 13;12:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-95.