Norman Robert G, Rapoport David M, Ayappa Indu
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Physiol Meas. 2007 Sep;28(9):1089-100. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/28/9/010. Epub 2007 Sep 5.
During sleep, the development of a plateau on the inspiratory airflow/time contour provides a non-invasive indicator of airway collapsibility. Humans recognize this abnormal contour easily, and this study replicates this with an artificial neural network (ANN) using a normalized shape. Five 10 min segments were selected from each of 18 sleep records (respiratory airflow measured with a nasal cannula) with varying degrees of sleep disordered breathing. Each breath was visually scored for shape, and breaths split randomly into a training and test set. Equally spaced, peak amplitude normalized flow values (representing breath shape) formed the only input to a back propagation ANN. Following training, breath-by-breath agreement of the ANN with the manual classification was tabulated for the training and test sets separately. Agreement of the ANN was 89% in the training set and 70.6% in the test set. When the categories of 'probably normal' and 'normal', and 'probably flow limited' and 'flow limited' were combined, the agreement increased to 92.7% and 89.4% respectively, similar to the intra- and inter-rater agreements obtained by a visual classification of these breaths. On a naive dataset, the agreement of the ANN to visual classification was 57.7% overall and 82.4% when the categories were collapsed. A neural network based only on the shape of inspiratory airflow succeeded in classifying breaths as to the presence/absence of flow limitation. This approach could be used to provide a standardized, reproducible and automated means of detecting elevated upper airway resistance.
在睡眠期间,吸气气流/时间曲线上平台期的出现提供了气道可塌陷性的一种非侵入性指标。人类能够轻松识别这种异常曲线,本研究使用归一化形状的人工神经网络(ANN)来重现这一过程。从18份睡眠记录(通过鼻导管测量呼吸气流)中各选取5个10分钟的片段,这些记录具有不同程度的睡眠呼吸紊乱。对每个呼吸的形状进行视觉评分,并将呼吸随机分为训练集和测试集。等间距的、峰值幅度归一化的流量值(代表呼吸形状)构成了反向传播ANN的唯一输入。训练后,分别列出训练集和测试集中ANN与人工分类的逐次呼吸一致性。ANN在训练集中的一致性为89%,在测试集中为70.6%。当将“可能正常”和“正常”以及“可能流量受限”和“流量受限”类别合并时,一致性分别提高到92.7%和89.4%,类似于通过这些呼吸的视觉分类获得的评分者内和评分者间一致性。在一个未经训练的数据集上,ANN与视觉分类的总体一致性为57.7%,类别合并时为82.4%。仅基于吸气气流形状的神经网络成功地将呼吸分类为是否存在流量受限。这种方法可用于提供一种标准化、可重复且自动化的检测上气道阻力升高的手段。