Suppr超能文献

安乐死:最后的悖论。

Euthanasia: the final paradox.

作者信息

Ellard John

机构信息

Mental Health Review Tribunal of New South Wales Balmoral Beach, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Australas Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;15(5):365-7. doi: 10.1080/10398560701441679.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper is to consider the history of human beings killing one another and reflect upon their reasons. Has it ever been altruistic?

METHOD

Important examples of large episodes of killing, such as wars, the Crusades, the Inquisition and genocides were examined.

RESULTS

Reasons are always advanced for killing large numbers of people who did not want to die. They were not based on logic nor on altruism but on moralities constructed from religious and political beliefs. Those who wanted to die because of unrelievable pain involved in the process of dying from an incurable illness are always preserved against their wishes. Once more, the reasons were usually religious and/or politically supported.

CONCLUSION

The belief that it is acceptable to kill those who do not want to die but unacceptable to kill those who want to die provides a curious paradox.

摘要

目的

本文旨在探讨人类相互残杀的历史并反思其原因。这种行为可曾出于利他主义?

方法

研究了大规模杀戮事件的重要实例,如战争、十字军东征、宗教裁判所及种族灭绝。

结果

总是能找到杀害大量不愿死亡之人的理由。这些理由既非基于逻辑,也不是出于利他主义,而是基于由宗教和政治信仰构建的道德观念。那些因身患绝症、临终过程痛苦不堪而想死的人,却总是违背其意愿而被阻止。同样,理由通常是宗教和/或政治方面的支持。

结论

认为杀害不愿死亡的人是可以接受的,而杀害想死的人则不可接受,这一观念构成了一个奇特的悖论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验