Suppr超能文献

减少学生认知偏差的教育方法的系统评价与荟萃分析。

Systematic review and meta-analysis of educational approaches to reduce cognitive biases among students.

作者信息

Swaryandini Ghassani, Graham Jessica, Griffith Shantell, Grilo Vasco, Ruzzante Federica, Zhang Xingruo, Yeung Siu Kit, Mangiarulo Marta, Basarkod Geetanjali, Ng Clarence, Parker Philip, Tangen Jason, Saeri Alexander, Grundy Emily, Slattery Peter, Noetel Michael

机构信息

School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Frente Animal, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02253-y.

Abstract

Resistance to cognitive biases is a crucial element of rationality that influences judgement and decision-making. Here we synthesized the effects of debiasing training in educational settings. Our systematic review found 54 randomized controlled trials consisting of 383 effect sizes and 10,941 participants. Our meta-analysis of educational interventions showed a small, yet significant, improvement in reducing the likelihood of committing biases compared with control conditions (g = 0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.14 to 0.39), 160 effects from 41 studies, P < 0.001). Most studies focused on reducing the likelihood of committing biases (for example, confirmation bias) using cognitive strategies. Some biases seemed difficult to overcome (for example, representativeness heuristic), and questions remain about the depth and transferability of learning beyond classroom settings. All studies had unclear or high risk of bias and there was some risk of publication bias. While evidence suggests that educational interventions can reduce bias on targeted tasks, more research is needed to determine whether these improvements translate to meaningful changes in real-world decision-making and to identify which paedagogical approaches are most effective for reducing the influence of cognitive biases.

摘要

对认知偏差的抵抗是影响判断和决策的理性的关键要素。在此,我们综合了教育环境中去偏训练的效果。我们的系统评价发现了54项随机对照试验,包含383个效应量和10941名参与者。我们对教育干预的荟萃分析表明,与对照条件相比,在减少出现偏差的可能性方面有微小但显著的改善(g = 0.26,95%置信区间为0.14至0.39),来自41项研究的160个效应量,P < 0.001)。大多数研究聚焦于使用认知策略降低出现偏差(例如,证实性偏差)的可能性。一些偏差似乎难以克服(例如,代表性启发法),并且关于课堂之外学习的深度和可转移性仍存在问题。所有研究的偏差风险均不明确或较高,且存在一定的发表偏倚风险。虽然有证据表明教育干预可以减少目标任务中的偏差,但仍需要更多研究来确定这些改善是否能转化为现实世界决策中的有意义变化,并确定哪种教学方法在减少认知偏差影响方面最有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验