• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个人与团队及个人与角色匹配度随时间的稳定性与变化:成长满意度、绩效和一般自我效能感的影响

Stability and change in person-team and person-role fit over time: the effects of growth satisfaction, performance, and general self-efficacy.

作者信息

DeRue D Scott, Morgeson Frederick P

机构信息

Eli Broad Graduate School of Management, Michigan State University, East Lansing, 48824-1122, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2007 Sep;92(5):1242-53. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1242.

DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1242
PMID:17845083
Abstract

Although considerable research has focused on various forms of person-environment fit, little research has examined how person-team and person-role fit operate over time in team contexts. To address this gap, the authors examined the dynamic nature of values-based person-team fit and person-role fit. They identified several factors that influence these fit perceptions over time. Individuals were composed into teams that worked intensively over an extended time period. Results suggest that person-team fit, when conceptualized as values congruence, is generally stable over time, but perceptions of person-role fit in teams are dynamic. Individuals' growth satisfaction and performance were positively related to increases in person-role fit over time. Furthermore, the effect of performance on person-role fit was moderated by individuals' general self-efficacy. Implications for managerial practice and future research are discussed.

摘要

尽管大量研究聚焦于各种形式的人与环境匹配,但很少有研究考察在团队环境中,人与团队匹配和人与角色匹配是如何随时间变化的。为了填补这一空白,作者们研究了基于价值观的人与团队匹配和人与角色匹配的动态本质。他们确定了几个随着时间影响这些匹配认知的因素。个体被组成团队,在一段较长时间内密集工作。结果表明,当将人与团队匹配概念化为价值观一致时,它通常随时间保持稳定,但团队中人与角色匹配的认知是动态的。个体的成长满意度和绩效与随着时间推移的人与角色匹配度增加呈正相关。此外,绩效对人与角色匹配的影响受到个体一般自我效能感的调节。文中还讨论了对管理实践和未来研究的启示。

相似文献

1
Stability and change in person-team and person-role fit over time: the effects of growth satisfaction, performance, and general self-efficacy.个人与团队及个人与角色匹配度随时间的稳定性与变化:成长满意度、绩效和一般自我效能感的影响
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Sep;92(5):1242-53. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1242.
2
An examination of the dynamic relationship between self-efficacy and performance across levels of analysis and levels of specificity.对自我效能感与不同分析层次和具体程度层次上的表现之间的动态关系进行考察。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Sep;91(5):1088-101. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1088.
3
Goal orientation: effects on backing up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams.目标导向:对团队中支持行为、绩效、效能和承诺的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Jul;90(4):811-8. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.811.
4
[Transactive memory in decision-making teams: implications for team effectiveness].[决策团队中的交互记忆:对团队效能的影响]
Psicothema. 2006 Nov;18(4):750-6.
5
Different fits satisfy different needs: linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory.不同的契合度满足不同的需求:运用自我决定理论将个人-环境契合度与员工敬业度和绩效联系起来。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Mar;94(2):465-77. doi: 10.1037/a0014068.
6
Person-organization fit and work-related attitudes and decisions: examining interactive effects with job fit and conscientiousness.个人与组织匹配度以及与工作相关的态度和决策:检验与工作匹配度和尽责性的交互作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Sep;92(5):1446-55. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1446.
7
The role of decision influence and team performance in member self-efficacy, withdrawal, satisfaction with the leader, and willingness to return.决策影响力和团队绩效在成员自我效能感、退出、对领导者的满意度以及回归意愿方面的作用。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2001 Jan;84(1):122-47. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2922.
8
Trait configurations in self-managed teams: a conceptual examination of the use of seeding for maximizing and minimizing trait variance in teams.自我管理团队中的特质配置:对运用种子法最大化和最小化团队特质差异的概念性审视。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 May;92(3):885-92. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.885.
9
The effect of filmed versus personal after-event reviews on task performance: the mediating and moderating role of self-efficacy.影片化与个人事后回顾对任务表现的影响:自我效能感的中介和调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jan;95(1):122-31. doi: 10.1037/a0017867.
10
A multilevel model of minority opinion expression and team decision-making effectiveness.多元层次模型视角下的少数派意见表达与团队决策有效性。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Sep;95(5):824-33. doi: 10.1037/a0019939.

引用本文的文献

1
The end of leadership? Person-group fit as a moderator in the relationship between charismatic leadership and individual outcomes.领导力的终结?个人与群体匹配度在魅力型领导与个体结果关系中的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 2;16:1615936. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1615936. eCollection 2025.
2
Does congruence between a descendant entrepreneur's personality traits and family business values matter for succession?后代企业家的个性特征与家族企业价值观之间的一致性对企业传承是否重要?
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 9;14:1043270. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1043270. eCollection 2023.
3
How to Keep Sustainable Development Between Enterprises and Employees? Evaluating the Impact of Person-Organization Fit and Person-Job Fit on Innovative Behavior.
企业与员工如何保持可持续发展?评估个人-组织匹配度和个人-工作匹配度对创新行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 30;12:653534. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.653534. eCollection 2021.
4
Teams in Small Organizations: Conceptual, Methodological, and Practical Considerations.小型组织中的团队:概念、方法及实践考量
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 18;12:530291. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.530291. eCollection 2021.
5
Getting the Work-Nonwork Interface You Are Looking for: The Relevance of Work-Nonwork Boundary Management Fit.获得你所期望的工作-非工作界面:工作-非工作边界管理匹配的相关性。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 17;9:1158. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01158. eCollection 2018.
6
One Big Happy Family? Unraveling the Relationship between Shared Perceptions of Team Psychological Contracts, Person-Team Fit and Team Performance.一个幸福的大家庭?解析团队心理契约的共同认知、个人与团队匹配度和团队绩效之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 9;8:1966. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01966. eCollection 2017.
7
Temporal issues in person-organization fit, person-job fit and turnover: The role of leader-member exchange.个人与组织匹配、个人与工作匹配及离职中的时间因素:领导成员交换的作用
Hum Relat. 2016 Dec;69(12):2177-2200. doi: 10.1177/0018726716636945. Epub 2016 May 20.
8
The general environment fit scale: a factor analysis and test of convergent construct validity.一般环境适宜性量表:聚合结构效度的因子分析与检验。
Am J Community Psychol. 2012 Sep;50(1-2):64-76. doi: 10.1007/s10464-011-9480-8.