Suppr超能文献

5-羟色胺激动剂治疗功能性消化不良:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Treatment of functional dyspepsia with serotonin agonists: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Hiyama Toru, Yoshihara Masaharu, Matsuo Keitaro, Kusunoki Hiroaki, Kamada Tomoari, Ito Masanori, Tanaka Shinji, Chayama Kazuaki, Haruma Ken

机构信息

Health Service Center, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Oct;22(10):1566-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04723.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is often treated with serotonin agonists; however, the efficacy of such agents has recently been questioned. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing serotonin agonists with other types of prokinetics in patients with FD.

METHODS

Included studies were RCTs that compared serotonin agonists, including cisapride and mosapride, with dopamine antagonists, including metoclopramide and domperidone, and an opiate agonist, trimebutine, in patients with FD. Studies were identified by searching the Medline database (January 1951 - January 2005) and Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2004), and by manual searches. The difference in the probability of patients' responses between the serotonin agonists and control agents was used as a summary statistic for the treatment effect. Meta-regression analysis was used to detect sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Five studies were identified. In total, 467 subjects were assigned to a serotonin agonist arm, and 322 subjects were assigned to a control arm. In the overall analysis, the summary statistic was 0.019 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.055 to 0.093; P = 0.612), indicating that the patients' responses to serotonin agonists were similar to those to control agents. However, in the stratified meta-analysis of cisapride and mosapride, mosapride had a 6.7% greater probability of producing a response compared with control agents (summary statistic: 0.067; 95% CI: 0.010-0.124; P = 0.021), whereas no significant effect was observed with cisapride.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that mosapride may be more effective than cisapride for the treatment of FD. Although FD is a chronic condition, efficacy was assessed over short periods in the studies used for the present meta-analysis. Long-term RCTs are needed to confirm the effect.

摘要

背景

功能性消化不良(FD)常使用5-羟色胺激动剂进行治疗;然而,此类药物的疗效近来受到质疑。本研究的目的是对比较5-羟色胺激动剂与其他类型促动力药治疗FD患者的随机对照试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析。

方法

纳入的研究为RCT,其比较了5-羟色胺激动剂(包括西沙必利和莫沙必利)与多巴胺拮抗剂(包括甲氧氯普胺和多潘立酮)以及一种阿片类激动剂曲美布汀治疗FD患者的效果。通过检索Medline数据库(1951年1月至2005年1月)和Cochrane图书馆(2004年第4期)以及手工检索来确定研究。5-羟色胺激动剂与对照药物之间患者反应概率的差异用作治疗效果的汇总统计量。采用荟萃回归分析来检测异质性来源。

结果

共确定了5项研究。总计467名受试者被分配至5-羟色胺激动剂组,322名受试者被分配至对照组。在总体分析中,汇总统计量为0.019(95%置信区间[CI]:-0.055至0.093;P = 0.612),表明患者对5-羟色胺激动剂的反应与对对照药物的反应相似。然而,在西沙必利和莫沙必利的分层荟萃分析中,与对照药物相比,莫沙必利产生反应的概率高6.7%(汇总统计量:0.067;95% CI:0.010 - 0.124;P = 0.021),而西沙必利未观察到显著效果。

结论

数据表明,莫沙必利治疗FD可能比西沙必利更有效。尽管FD是一种慢性病,但在本荟萃分析所用的研究中,疗效是在短时间内评估的。需要长期RCT来证实其效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验