Hockley William E, Niewiadomski Marty W
Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Mem Cognit. 2007 Jun;35(4):679-88. doi: 10.3758/bf03193306.
Strength-based mirror effects occur when the hit rate is higher and the false alarm rate is lower following strongly encoded study lists than when following more weakly encoded study lists. In Experiments 1A and 1B, strength-based mirror effects were observed in separate tests of single item and associative recognition for random word pairs. In Experiment 2, strength-based mirror effects were again seen when item and associative recognition were tested together. Finally, in Experiments 3 and 4, opposing strength-based mirror effects were observed for item and associative recognition when individual words and word pairs were presented at different rates in the same study lists. Strength-based mirror effects could result from participants' adopting a more conservative decision criterion following strong lists than following weak ones. If this is the case for both item and associative recognition, the present results demonstrate that subjects can adopt different response criteria for different recognition tasks and can alternate between them on a trial-by-trial basis.
当对编码较强的学习列表进行测试时,命中率较高且误报率较低,而对编码较弱的学习列表进行测试时情况则相反,此时就会出现基于强度的镜像效应。在实验1A和1B中,在对随机单词对进行单项和联想识别的单独测试中观察到了基于强度的镜像效应。在实验2中,当对项目和联想识别一起进行测试时,再次出现了基于强度的镜像效应。最后,在实验3和4中,当在同一学习列表中以不同速率呈现单个单词和单词对时,在项目和联想识别中观察到了相反的基于强度的镜像效应。基于强度的镜像效应可能是由于参与者在面对较强列表时比面对较弱列表时采用了更保守的决策标准。如果项目和联想识别都是这种情况,那么目前的结果表明,受试者可以针对不同的识别任务采用不同的反应标准,并且可以在逐个试验的基础上在它们之间进行切换。