Department of Psychology, New York University, New Yotablerk, NY, USA.
Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2019 Feb;47(2):266-278. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0864-y.
The mirror effect is a pattern of results generally found in two-condition recognition memory experiments that is consistent with normative signal detection theory as a model of recognition. However, the claim has been made that there is a distinct mirror effect, the "strength mirror effect," that differs from the normative one. This claim is based on experiments on recognition memory in which repetition or study time is varied to produce differences in accuracy, where typically the ordinary mirror effect pattern is absent. If this claim is correct, it has major implications for theories of recognition memory. Therefore, a full examination of the data that support the claim was called for. To do that, we replicated the basic demonstration of the no-mirror-effect data and analyzed it further in a series of experiments. The analysis showed the following: (1) Whether or not the mirror effect occurs is determined by whether the experimenter furnishes effective discriminanda that distinguish the weak and strong conditions for the participant. (2) Once Finding 1 is taken into account, no adjustments of or additions to the normative signal detection theory explanations are necessary. (3) There is only one mirror effect, and no separate "strength mirror effect."
镜像效应是在两种条件识别记忆实验中普遍存在的一种结果模式,它与规范性信号检测理论作为识别模型是一致的。然而,有人声称存在一种明显的镜像效应,即“强度镜像效应”,与规范性的镜像效应不同。这一说法是基于对识别记忆的实验得出的,在这些实验中,通过重复或学习时间的变化来产生准确性的差异,通常情况下,普通的镜像效应模式并不存在。如果这一说法是正确的,那么它对识别记忆理论将产生重大影响。因此,有必要对支持这一说法的数据进行全面审查。为此,我们复制了基本的无镜像效应数据的演示,并在一系列实验中进一步进行了分析。分析结果表明:(1)镜像效应是否发生取决于实验者是否提供了有效的辨别标准,以便参与者区分弱条件和强条件。(2)一旦考虑到发现 1,就不需要对规范性信号检测理论的解释进行任何调整或补充。(3)只有一种镜像效应,没有单独的“强度镜像效应”。