Hannah Samuel D, Allan Lorraine G
School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.
Learn Behav. 2011 May;39(2):171-90. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0015-9.
Siegel, Allan, Hannah, and Crump (2009) demonstrated that cue interaction effects in human contingency judgments reflect processing that occurs after the acquisition of information. This finding is in conflict with a broad class of theories. We present a new postacquisition model, the criterion-calibration model, that describes cue interaction effects as involving shifts in a report criterion. The model accounts for the Siegel et al. data and outperforms the only other postacquisition model of cue interaction, Stout and Miller's (2007) SOCR model. We present new data from an experiment designed to evaluate a prediction of the two models regarding reciprocal cue interaction effects. The new data provide further support for the criterion-calibration model.
西格尔、艾伦、汉娜和克伦普（2009年）证明，人类偶然性判断中的线索交互效应反映了信息获取后发生的加工过程。这一发现与一大类理论相冲突。我们提出了一种新的获取后模型，即标准校准模型，该模型将线索交互效应描述为涉及报告标准的转变。该模型解释了西格尔等人的数据，并且优于线索交互的唯一其他获取后模型，即斯托特和米勒（2007年）的SOCR模型。我们展示了一项实验的新数据，该实验旨在评估这两种模型关于相互线索交互效应的预测。这些新数据为标准校准模型提供了进一步的支持。
