Lloyd-Jones Toby J, Nettlemill Mandy
Department of Psychology, University of Wales Swansea, Swansea, Wales.
Mem Cognit. 2007 Jun;35(4):816-36. doi: 10.3758/bf03193317.
We used a deadline procedure to investigate how time pressure may influence the processes involved in picture naming. The deadline exaggerated errors found under naming without deadline. There were also category differences in performance between living and nonliving things and, in particular, for animals versus fruit and vegetables. The majority of errors were visuallyand semantically related to the target (e. celery-asparagus), and there was a greater proportion of these errors made to living things. Importantly, there were also more visual-semantic errors to animals than to fruit and vegetables. In addition, there were a smaller number of pure semantic errors (e.g., nut-bolt), which were made predominantly to nonliving things. The different kinds of error were correlated with different variables. Overall, visual-semantic errors were associated with visual complexity and visual similarity, whereas pure semantic errors were associated with imageability and age of acquisition. However, for animals, visual-semantic errors were associated with visual complexity, whereas for fruit and vegetables they were associated with visual similarity. We discuss these findings in terms of theories of category-specific semantic impairment and models of picture naming.
我们采用了限时程序来研究时间压力如何影响图片命名过程。限时使无时间限制命名时出现的错误增多。在对有生命和无生命事物的表现上存在类别差异,特别是在动物与水果和蔬菜之间。大多数错误在视觉和语义上与目标相关(例如,芹菜 - 芦笋),并且这些错误中针对有生命事物的比例更大。重要的是,与水果和蔬菜相比,针对动物的视觉 - 语义错误更多。此外,纯语义错误(例如,坚果 - 螺栓)数量较少,主要出现在无生命事物上。不同类型的错误与不同变量相关。总体而言,视觉 - 语义错误与视觉复杂性和视觉相似性相关,而纯语义错误与可想象性和习得年龄相关。然而,对于动物,视觉 - 语义错误与视觉复杂性相关,而对于水果和蔬菜,它们与视觉相似性相关。我们根据特定类别语义损伤理论和图片命名模型来讨论这些发现。