• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

典型性、独特性和相关性:对生物和非生物概念的语义属性的分析。

Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts.

机构信息

University of Cambridge Neurology Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Cogn Neuropsychol. 2001 Mar 1;18(2):125-74. doi: 10.1080/02643290125857.

DOI:10.1080/02643290125857
PMID:20945209
Abstract

Many cognitive psychological, computational, and neuropsychological approaches to the organisation of semantic memory have incorporated the idea that concepts are, at least partly, represented in terms of their fine-grained features. We asked 20 normal volunteers to provide properties of 64 concrete items, drawn from living and nonliving categories, by completing simple sentence stems (e.g., an owl is __, has , can). At a later date, the same participants rated the same concepts for prototypicality and familiarity. The features generated were classified as to type of knowledge (sensory, functional, or encyclopaedic), and also quantified with regard to both dominance (the number of participants specifying that property for that concept) and distinctiveness (the proportion of exemplars within a conceptual category of which that feature was considered characteristic). The results demonstrate that rated prototypicality is related to both the familiarity of the concept and its distance from the average of the exemplars within the same category (the category centroid). The feature database was also used to replicate, resolve, and extend a variety of previous observations on the structure of semantic representations. Specifically, the results of our analyses (1) resolve two conflicting claims regarding the relative ratio of sensory to other kinds of attributes in living vs. nonliving concepts; (2) offer new information regarding the types of features-across different domains-that distinguish concepts from their category coordinates; and (3) corroborate some previous claims of higher intercorrelations between features of living things than those of artefacts.

摘要

许多认知心理学、计算科学和神经心理学方法都将概念至少部分地以其精细特征来表示这一观点纳入了语义记忆的组织中。我们要求 20 名正常志愿者通过完成简单的句子主干(例如,猫头鹰是__,有__,能__)来描述 64 个具体项目(来自生物和非生物类别)的属性。在稍后的日期,相同的参与者会对相同的概念进行原型和熟悉度的评估。生成的特征根据知识类型(感官、功能或百科全书)进行分类,并根据主导性(指定该属性的参与者数量)和独特性(被视为该特征特征的概念类别内的范例比例)进行量化。结果表明,评分的典型性与概念的熟悉度以及与同一类别内范例平均值(类别质心)的距离有关。特征数据库还用于复制、解决和扩展关于语义表示结构的各种先前观察结果。具体而言,我们的分析结果(1)解决了关于生物与非生物概念中感官与其他类型属性的相对比例的两个相互矛盾的说法;(2)提供了关于在不同领域区分概念与其类别坐标的特征类型的新信息;(3)证实了一些关于生物特征之间的相关性高于人工制品之间的相关性的先前说法。

相似文献

1
Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts.典型性、独特性和相关性:对生物和非生物概念的语义属性的分析。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2001 Mar 1;18(2):125-74. doi: 10.1080/02643290125857.
2
Analysis of the semantic representations of living and nonliving concepts: A normative study.分析生物和非生物概念的语义表达:一项规范性研究。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2006;23(4):515-40. doi: 10.1080/02643290542000067.
3
Feature type effects in semantic memory: an event related potentials study.语义记忆中的特征类型效应:一项事件相关电位研究。
Neurosci Lett. 2005 Dec 30;390(3):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.08.015. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
4
Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: a distributed account of category-specific deficits.概念结构与概念的结构:对类别特异性缺陷的分布式解释。
Brain Lang. 2000 Nov;75(2):195-231. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2353.
5
Semantic processing of living and nonliving concepts across the cerebral hemispheres.大脑两半球对生物和非生物概念的语义加工
Brain Lang. 2005 Jul;94(1):86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.12.001. Epub 2005 Jan 28.
6
Why is a verb like an inanimate object? Grammatical category and semantic category deficits.为什么动词像无生命的物体?语法范畴和语义范畴缺陷。
Brain Lang. 2000 May;72(3):246-309. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2292.
7
Genetic and environmental influences on the organisation of semantic memory in the brain:is "living things" an innate category?遗传和环境对大脑语义记忆组织的影响:“生物”是一种先天类别吗?
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):401-8. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000293.
8
Classification deficits in Alzheimer's disease with special reference to living and nonliving things.阿尔茨海默病中的分类缺陷,特别涉及生物与非生物。
Brain Lang. 1996 Aug;54(2):335-58. doi: 10.1006/brln.1996.0079.
9
Selective impairment of living things and musical instruments on a verbal 'Semantic Knowledge Questionnaire' in a case of apperceptive visual agnosia.知觉性视觉失认症病例在言语“语义知识问卷”上对生物和乐器的选择性损伤。
Brain Cogn. 2012 Oct;80(1):155-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
10
Evaluating feature-category relations using semantic fluency tasks.使用语义流畅性任务评估特征-类别关系。
Brain Cogn. 2005 Jul;58(2):202-12. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.11.004.

引用本文的文献

1
From semantic knowledge to semantic features: French semantic feature production norms for 360 concepts.从语义知识到语义特征:360个概念的法语语义特征生成规范
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Sep 10;57(10):282. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02814-z.
2
Representational similarity learning reveals a graded multidimensional semantic space in the human anterior temporal cortex.表征相似性学习揭示了人类前颞叶皮质中的一个分级多维语义空间。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Feb 22;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00093. eCollection 2024.
3
Neural Distinction between Visual Word and Object Recognition: An fMRI Study Using Pictographs.
视觉单词与物体识别之间的神经差异:一项使用象形文字的功能磁共振成像研究
J Neurosci. 2025 Jul 9;45(28):e2322242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2322-24.2025.
4
Better Together: Integrating Multivariate with Univariate Methods, and MEG with EEG to Study Language Comprehension.协同共进:整合多变量与单变量方法,以及将脑磁图与脑电图结合用于研究语言理解
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2024;39(8):991-1019. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2023.2223783. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
5
Feats: A database of semantic features for early produced noun concepts.特点:早期生成名词概念的语义特征数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):3259-3279. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02242-x. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
6
Semantic feature norms: a cross-method and cross-language comparison.语义特征规范:跨方法和跨语言比较。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):5788-5797. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02311-1. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
7
Is "earth" an animate thing? Cross-language and inter-age analyses of animacy word ratings in European Portuguese and British English young and older adults.“地球”是有生命的东西吗?欧洲葡萄牙语和英国英语中青年和老年被试对有生命词评价的跨语言和跨年龄分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 4;18(8):e0289755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289755. eCollection 2023.
8
Bigram semantic distance as an index of continuous semantic flow in natural language: Theory, tools, and applications.双词语义距离作为自然语言中连续语义流的指标:理论、工具和应用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Sep;152(9):2578-2590. doi: 10.1037/xge0001389. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
9
Balancing novelty and appropriateness leads to creative associations in children.在新奇性和适宜性之间取得平衡会促使儿童产生创造性联想。
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Dec 2;1(5):pgac273. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac273. eCollection 2022 Nov.
10
Semantic flow and its relation to controlled semantic retrieval deficits in the narrative production of people with aphasia.语义流及其与失语症患者叙事产生中受控语义检索缺陷的关系。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Jun 6;170:108235. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108235. Epub 2022 Apr 14.