Morgan Perri A, Strand Justine, Østbye Truls, Albanese Mark A
Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC 3848, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;42(5):2022-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00700.x.
To assess applicability of national health survey data for generalizable research on outpatient care by physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs).
Methodology descriptions and 2003 data files from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, and the Community Tracking Study.
Surveys were assessed for utility for research on PA and NP patient care, with respect to survey coverage, structure, content, generalizability to the U.S. population, and validity. National estimates of patient encounters, statistically adjusted for survey design and nonresponse, were compared across surveys.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Surveys were identified through literature review, selected according to inclusion criteria, and analyzed based on methodology descriptions. Quantitative analyses used publicly available data downloaded from survey websites.
Surveys varied with respect to applicability to PA and NP care. Features limiting applicability included (1) sampling schemes that inconsistently capture nonphysician practice, (2) inaccurate identification of provider type, and (3) data structure that does not support analysis of team practice.
Researchers using national health care surveys to analyze PA and NP patient interactions should account for design features that may differentially affect nonphysician data. Workforce research that includes NPs and PAs is needed for national planning efforts, and this research will require improved survey methodologies.
评估国家卫生调查数据在医师助理(PA)和执业护士(NP)门诊护理可推广性研究中的适用性。
来自国家门诊医疗护理调查、国家医院门诊医疗护理调查、医疗支出小组调查和社区追踪研究的方法描述及2003年数据文件。
就调查覆盖范围、结构、内容、对美国人群的可推广性及有效性,评估各项调查对PA和NP患者护理研究的实用性。对经调查设计和无应答情况进行统计调整后的患者就诊国家估计数在各项调查间进行比较。
数据收集/提取方法:通过文献回顾确定各项调查,根据纳入标准进行选择,并基于方法描述进行分析。定量分析使用从调查网站下载的公开可用数据。
各项调查在对PA和NP护理的适用性方面存在差异。限制适用性的特征包括:(1)抽样方案不能一致地涵盖非医师执业情况;(2)提供者类型识别不准确;(3)数据结构不支持团队执业分析。
使用国家医疗保健调查分析PA和NP患者互动情况的研究人员应考虑可能对非医师数据产生不同影响的设计特征。国家规划工作需要开展包含NP和PA的劳动力研究,而此项研究将需要改进调查方法。