Ezeome Emmanuel R, Anarado Agnes N
Department of Surgery, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria.
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2007 Sep 12;7:28. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-7-28.
The use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) by cancer patients is very common and varies between populations. The referenced English literature has no local study from Africa on this subject. This study was conducted to define the prevalence, pattern of use, and factors influencing the use of CAM by cancer patients at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Enugu (UNTH-E), Nigeria
Face-to-face interviews using semi-structured questionnaire were used to determine the use of CAM by cancer patients. All consenting cancer patients were interviewed as they presented at the core surgical units of the UNTH- E, from June 2003 to September 2005.
160 patients were interviewed; 68 (42.5%) were males and 94 (57.5%) were females. Ages ranged from 13-86 years. Breast, urogenital system, gastrointestinal system, and soft tissue cancers predominated. One hundred and four patients (65.0%) have used CAM at some time during their current cancer illness; 56 (35.0%) patients have not used any form of CAM. There were more females than males among the non-CAM users. The use of CAM was not affected by age, marital status, level of education, religious affiliation, or socioeconomic status. The most frequently used CAMs were herbs (51.9%), faith/prayer healing (49.4%), aloe vera (23.1%), Forever Living Products (16.3%), medicinal tea (14.4%), and Blackstone (12.5%). Over 23% of those who used CAM were satisfied, but 68.3% were disappointed. Most users (67.3%) did not see any benefit from the CAM, but 25% could describe some specific benefits. More than 21% of users reported various unwanted effects. While 86.5% of CAM users will use orthodox medicine instead of CAM in the future, 9.6% will use the two together to help each other. Most users (79.8%) will not repeat CAM or recommend its use for cancer. The majority of patients (55.8%) did not mention their use of CAM to their doctors - mostly because the doctor did not ask.
CAM use is common among cancer patients in Nigeria. Most users do not obtain the expected benefits, and adverse events are not uncommon. Every clinician in the field of oncology should ask his/her patients about the use of CAM; this knowledge will enable them to better counsel the patients.
癌症患者使用补充替代医学(CAM)的情况非常普遍,且因人群而异。英文参考文献中没有来自非洲关于该主题的本地研究。本研究旨在确定尼日利亚埃努古尼日利亚大学教学医院(UNTH - E)癌症患者使用CAM的患病率、使用模式及影响因素。
采用半结构化问卷进行面对面访谈,以确定癌症患者对CAM的使用情况。2003年6月至2005年9月期间,所有同意参与的癌症患者在UNTH - E的核心外科病房就诊时接受了访谈。
共访谈了160名患者;其中男性68名(42.5%),女性94名(57.5%)。年龄范围为13 - 86岁。乳腺癌、泌尿生殖系统癌、胃肠道癌和软组织癌为主。104名患者(65.0%)在当前患癌期间曾使用过CAM;56名患者(35.0%)未使用过任何形式的CAM。未使用CAM的患者中女性多于男性。CAM的使用不受年龄、婚姻状况、教育程度、宗教信仰或社会经济地位的影响。最常使用的CAM包括草药(51.9%)、信仰/祈祷疗法(49.4%)、芦荟(23.1%)、Forever Living Products(16.3%)、药茶(14.4%)和Blackstone(12.5%)。超过23%使用CAM的患者感到满意,但68.3%的患者感到失望。大多数使用者(67.3%)认为CAM没有任何益处,但25%的使用者能描述一些具体益处。超过21%的使用者报告了各种不良影响。虽然86.5%的CAM使用者未来会选择使用正统医学而非CAM,但9.6%的使用者会将两者结合使用以相互辅助。大多数使用者(79.8%)不会再次使用CAM或推荐其用于癌症治疗。大多数患者(55.8%)未向医生提及他们使用CAM的情况——主要原因是医生未询问。
在尼日利亚,癌症患者中使用CAM的情况很常见。大多数使用者未获得预期益处,不良事件也并不罕见。肿瘤学领域的每位临床医生都应询问其患者关于CAM的使用情况;这些信息将使他们能够更好地为患者提供咨询。