Suppr超能文献

巴基斯坦癌症患者对非常规治疗方法的使用。

Use of unconventional methods of therapy by cancer patients in Pakistan.

作者信息

Malik I A, Khan N A, Khan W

机构信息

National Cancer Institute, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Eur J Epidemiol. 2000 Feb;16(2):155-60. doi: 10.1023/a:1007621104789.

Abstract

Most of the studies related to the use of unconventional methods of therapy by cancer patients have been carried out in the developed countries. This study was conducted to ascertain the frequency, type, and duration of use of unconventional methods of therapy by cancer patients in Pakistan. We also wanted to identify individuals who are most likely to use these methods and to compare the findings with those reported from the developed countries. Between 1 April and 30 May 1994, all patients with histologically proven cancer who visited the oncology unit were interviewed. A printed questionnaire with questions and options was used as an interview guide. Informed consent was obtained. One hundred and ninety-one patients were interviewed, on average, for 25 minutes each. Use of unconventional methods of therapy by cancer patients was widespread (54.5% of all patients). The majority (83.7%) were influenced by family members to use these methods. Traditional herbal medicines (70.2%) and homeopathy (64.4%) were the most commonly employed methods. Thirty-six percent of the users employed these methods before receiving any conventional therapy. Only 15% used these methods after conventional therapeutic options had been exhausted. Patients generally perceived these methods as useful, non-toxic and inexpensive. Age, marital status, socio-economic background, education level and status of underlying neoplasm did not influence the frequency of use of unconventional methods. The use, however, was influenced by gender, family size, and type of underlying malignancy. Patients aware of their diagnosis were less likely to use these methods. This study suggests that use of unconventional methods by cancer patients in Pakistan is widespread. Unlike western countries, these methods are often employed before receiving any conventional therapy. This probably results in a significant delay which can be expected to adversely influence the subsequent disease management and survival. Public education, reduction of cost and easy availability of conventional therapy may be helpful in reducing the use of methods which otherwise may have no proven value.

摘要

大多数关于癌症患者使用非常规治疗方法的研究是在发达国家开展的。本研究旨在确定巴基斯坦癌症患者使用非常规治疗方法的频率、类型和持续时间。我们还想找出最有可能使用这些方法的人群,并将研究结果与发达国家的报告结果进行比较。1994年4月1日至5月31日期间,对所有前往肿瘤科就诊且经组织学确诊为癌症的患者进行了访谈。使用一份印有问题和选项的问卷作为访谈指南。获得了知情同意。共访谈了191名患者,平均每人访谈25分钟。癌症患者使用非常规治疗方法的情况很普遍(占所有患者的54.5%)。大多数人(83.7%)是受家庭成员影响而使用这些方法的。传统草药(70.2%)和顺势疗法(64.4%)是最常用的方法。36%的使用者在接受任何常规治疗之前就采用了这些方法。只有15%的人在常规治疗方案用尽后才使用这些方法。患者普遍认为这些方法有用、无毒且价格低廉。年龄、婚姻状况、社会经济背景、教育水平和潜在肿瘤的状况并未影响非常规方法的使用频率。然而,使用情况受到性别、家庭规模和潜在恶性肿瘤类型的影响。知晓自己诊断结果的患者使用这些方法的可能性较小。本研究表明,巴基斯坦癌症患者使用非常规方法的情况很普遍。与西方国家不同的是,这些方法常常在接受任何常规治疗之前就被采用。这可能会导致显著的延误,预计会对后续的疾病管理和生存产生不利影响。开展公众教育、降低常规治疗的成本并使其更容易获得,可能有助于减少使用那些否则可能没有经证实价值的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验