Randell T, Saarnivaara L, Oikkonen M, Lindgren L
Department of Anaesthesia, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991 Oct;35(7):651-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1991.tb03366.x.
Two modes of administration of an anticholinergic drug were compared in 58 healthy children undergoing adenoidectomy. The study was double-blind and randomized. All children were premedicated with oral midazolam 0.5 mg/kg. Twenty-nine children received oral atropine 0.03 mg/kg (Group A) and the rest were given i.v. glycopyrrolate 0.005 mg/kg at the induction of anaesthesia (Group G). In Group A, of 29 children, the stomach was empty in 2, pH was less than 2.5 in 23, the gastric volume was greater than 0.4 ml/kg in 19, and both these risk factors were present in 17 children. The same figures in Group G were 5 (NS), 14 (P less than 0.05), 10 (P less than 0.05) and 9 (P less than 0.05) children, respectively. The antisialagogue effect was similar in both groups.
在58名接受腺样体切除术的健康儿童中比较了抗胆碱能药物的两种给药方式。该研究为双盲随机研究。所有儿童均口服咪达唑仑0.5mg/kg进行术前用药。29名儿童口服阿托品0.03mg/kg(A组),其余儿童在麻醉诱导时静脉注射格隆溴铵0.005mg/kg(G组)。A组29名儿童中,2名胃排空,23名pH值小于2.5,19名胃容量大于0.4ml/kg,17名儿童存在这两种危险因素。G组相应的数字分别为5名(无统计学差异)、14名(P<0.05)、10名(P<0.05)和9名(P<0.05)儿童。两组的抗唾液分泌作用相似。