Suppr超能文献

腹腔干分支的解剖学研究(IV)。研究结果与足立分类法的比较

[Anatomical study on the branches of the celiac trunk (IV). Comparison of the findings with Adachi's classification].

作者信息

Shoumura S, Emura S, Utsumi M, Chen H, Hayakawa D, Yamahira T, Isono H

机构信息

Department of Anatomy, Gifu University School of Medicine, Japan.

出版信息

Kaibogaku Zasshi. 1991 Oct;66(5):452-61.

PMID:1785254
Abstract

The authors studied the mode of branching of the celiac trunk in 184 Japanese cadavers during dissecting practice at Gifu University from 1985 to 1988. The findings were as follows; 1) One hundred and sixty-six of the 184 cases belonged to Type I of Adachi's classification of variation in the arrangement of the branches of the celiac trunk. One hundred and twenty-nine cases belonged to Group 1, one case to Group 2, 10 cases to Group 3, 9 cases to Group 4, one case to Group 6, 2 cases to Group 7, 8 cases to Group 8 and 4 cases to Group 11. Two cases did not belong to any group. One of them had an anastomosis between the hepatic artery and the superior mesenteric artery. The other one had the middle colic artery arising from the hepatic artery. 2) Seven cases belonged to Type II, Group 12. 3) Two cases belonged to Type III. One belonged to Group 18. The other one had an accessory right hepatic artery arising from the superior mesenteric artery. 4) One case belonged to Type IV, Group 20. 5) Three cases belonged to Type V, Group 23. 6) Two cases belonged to Type VI. One case had a gastrolienal trunk and an accessory right hepatic artery arising from the superior mesenteric artery. The other one had a gastrolienal trunk and an accessory right hepatic artery arising from the gastrolienal trunk. 7) Of the 184 cases, three could not be classified according to Adachi. Two cases had a gastrolienal trunk and the hepatic artery arising from the abdominal aorta. One case had a lienomesenteric trunk and a gastrohepatic trunk.

摘要

作者于1985年至1988年在岐阜大学解剖实习期间,对184具日本尸体的腹腔干分支模式进行了研究。结果如下:1)184例中有166例属于安达氏腹腔干分支排列变异分类的I型。其中129例属于第1组,1例属于第2组,10例属于第3组,9例属于第4组,1例属于第6组,2例属于第7组,8例属于第8组,4例属于第11组。2例不属于任何组。其中1例肝动脉与肠系膜上动脉之间存在吻合。另一例中结肠动脉发自肝动脉。2)7例属于II型,第12组。3)2例属于III型。1例属于第18组。另一例有一支副右肝动脉发自肠系膜上动脉。4)1例属于IV型,第20组。5)3例属于V型,第23组。6)2例属于VI型。1例有胃脾干和一支副右肝动脉发自肠系膜上动脉。另一例有胃脾干和一支副右肝动脉发自胃脾干。7)在184例中,有3例无法按安达氏分类。2例有胃脾干,肝动脉发自腹主动脉。1例有脾肠系膜干和胃肝干。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验