Wiles Jonathan D, Allum Simon R, Coleman Damian A, Swaine Ian L
Department of Sport Science, Tourism and Leisure, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK.
J Sports Sci. 2008 Jan 15;26(2):155-62. doi: 10.1080/02640410701370655.
Currently, it is not possible to prescribe isometric exercise at an intensity that corresponds to given heart rates or systolic blood pressures. This might be useful in optimizing the effects of isometric exercise training. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the relationships between isometric exercise intensity and both heart rate and systolic blood pressure during repeated incremental isometric exercise tests. Fifteen participants performed seated isometric double-leg knee extension, during which maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) was assessed, using an isokinetic dynamometer. From this, a corresponding peak electromyographic activity (EMG(peak)) was determined. Subsequently, participants performed two incremental isometric exercise tests (at least 48 h apart) at 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30% EMG(peak), during which steady-state heart rate and systolic blood pressure were recorded. In all participants, there were linear relationships between %EMG(peak) and heart rate (r at least 0.91; P < 0.05) and between %EMG(peak) and systolic blood pressure (r at least 0.92; P < 0.05). Also, when repeated tests were compared, there were no differences in the slopes (P > 0.50) or elevations (P > 0.10) for either of the relationships. Therefore, these linear relationships could be used to identify isometric exercise training intensities that correspond to precise heart rates or systolic blood pressures. Training performed in this way might provide greater insight into the underlying mechanisms for the cardiovascular adaptations that are known to occur as a result.
目前,尚无法按照与给定心率或收缩压相对应的强度来规定等长运动。这在优化等长运动训练效果方面可能会有所帮助。因此,本研究的目的是在重复递增等长运动测试期间,探索等长运动强度与心率和收缩压之间的关系。15名参与者进行了坐姿等长双腿膝关节伸展运动,在此期间使用等速测力计评估最大自主收缩(MVC)。据此确定相应的峰值肌电图活动(EMG(peak))。随后,参与者在10%、15%、20%、25%和30%的EMG(peak)水平下进行了两次递增等长运动测试(间隔至少48小时),在此期间记录稳态心率和收缩压。在所有参与者中,EMG(peak)百分比与心率之间存在线性关系(r至少为0.91;P<0.05),EMG(peak)百分比与收缩压之间也存在线性关系(r至少为0.92;P<0.05)。此外,当比较重复测试时,两种关系的斜率(P>0.50)或截距(P>0.10)均无差异。因此,这些线性关系可用于确定与精确心率或收缩压相对应的等长运动训练强度。以这种方式进行的训练可能会更深入地了解已知由此产生的心血管适应的潜在机制。