Su Chwen-Yng, Lin Yueh-Hsieh, Kwan Aij-Lie, Guo Nai-Wen
School of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Science, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Mar;22(2):273-87. doi: 10.1080/13854040701220036.
This study examined the factor structure and contrasted-group validity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-64 (WCST-64) in a stroke sample (n = 112). Confirmatory factor analyses were used to compare five different models suggested by prior factor analyses. The results indicated that the WCST-64 was best represented by a three-dimensional model comprising response inflexibility (factor 1), ineffective hypothesis-testing strategy (factor 2), and set maintenance (factor 3). A significant overall multivariate effect for group (F = 2.87, df = 18,495.46, p <.001) was found in a multivariate analysis of covariance with WCST scores as dependent variables and four different groups (three stroke subgroups with different levels of cognitive function and a normal control group) as independent variable, after controlling for gender. The results of discriminant analysis supported the use of the WCST-64 in stroke patients with cognitive impairment.
本研究在一个中风样本(n = 112)中检验了威斯康星卡片分类测验-64(WCST-64)的因子结构和分组效度。采用验证性因子分析来比较先前因子分析提出的五种不同模型。结果表明,WCST-64最好由一个三维模型来表示,该模型包括反应灵活性缺乏(因子1)、无效的假设检验策略(因子2)和定势维持(因子3)。在以WCST分数为因变量、四个不同组(三个具有不同认知功能水平的中风亚组和一个正常对照组)为自变量的多变量协方差分析中,在控制性别后,发现组间存在显著的总体多变量效应(F = 2.87,df = 18,495.46,p <.001)。判别分析结果支持在有认知障碍的中风患者中使用WCST-64。